Just make sure you don't reorder packets, or things will break.
Karl
On Oct 14, 2005, at 9:28 AM, James Carlson wrote:
Vishwas Manral writes:
You rightly guessed it. It is the "common" case, I was enquiring
about.
I was wondering if cases where we had uncompressed fields even
when ACFC
and PFC were configured, we may not necessarily handle it in the fast
path and yet handle it in the slow path.
The standards say nothing about "fast" or "slow" -- those are
implementation and customer acceptance issues. They say only that it
must work.
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
