Re: <draft-ietf-pppext-rfc2284bis-10.txt>: typo in section 4.1

Thanks,

The problem seems to be my interpretation of an "additional request", here
it is a retransmission not a new request.
My fault.

    Suresh


Bernard Aboba wrote:

> It is indeed a MUST. That's how EAP provides reliable delivery.
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 suresh.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Should the MUST be MUST NOT in the following sentence of section 4.1
> > "Additional Request packets MUST be sent until a valid Response packet
> > is received, or an optional retry counter expires."
> >
> > Regards,
> >     Suresh
> >