(Sent for Adrian Farrel)
PESCI meeting 12th October 2005, 2pm GMT
Michael, Elwyn, Scott, Brian, Harald, Adrian
Adrian taking notes
Agenda
- BOF
- Provide clarity for final edit by Elwyn
* BOF
- BOF will be hosted by Bert and Sam as Gen Area ADs
- Sam and Bert will decide who will chair
- PESCI team doesn't mind who chairs so long as:
- fair and neutral
- has some clue about IETF process
* Open issues with revision F of the draft
- Discussed the level of support required within the IETF for process
change
- Talked around issue of "making it as easy as possible for open
participation"
- Used input from pesci-discuss and existing RFCs
- Listed current capabilities needed by ADs
- technically competent
- human managers
- operational managers
- developers of process
Agreed that these capabilities do not all constitute a principle, but
the first
two probably do.
- Discussed which component bodies/roles are stable
- Considered in particular what role the IAB should have in process
change
- Identified potential issues when roles overlap
* Next Steps (section in I-D)
- Examined whether a design team is appropriate and acceptable
as a way of advancing process change. Issues include:
- A design team is able to focus and produce work for open discussion
- The design team would need a charter
- How does the design team get formed?
- Multiple design teams are acceptable
* Next Steps (for PESCI work)
- Further round of feedback from team to Elwyn ASAP (within 12 hours)
- New version of I-D delivered to team by start of US business Friday
- Comments back to Elwyn by Sunday evening
- Aim to submit on or before 17th October
[is in I-D queue right now...]
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|