Re: Invitation to discuss: "P2MP problem statement"

Loa,

Just the fact that 12 people from various organizations have shown enough 
interest to contribute to the existing drafts (and indeed that there are 
multiple proposals) demonstrates that this functionality is not a 
single-person or single-organization issue.  Would you feel differently if 
one person had written a draft and 11 others spoke up on the list?
Thanks,
Andy

---------

At 9/3/2003 09:36 AM +0200, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> it is almost three weeks since I sent this "invitation to
> discuss the P2MP probelm statement". The tendency has been
> mostly in favor of adding p2mp mpls as a new milestone to
> our charter, but the discussion has not been that active,
> so it is hard to decide one way or another. Apart from the
> authors (the author groups is about 12 people) it is only
> one person that has taken part in the discussion.
>
> I'm aware of that we had a mailing list problem, but it is
> my take that the mails gone through eventually, if you think
> this is wrong please resend.
>
> Before deciding I would like a quick "show of hands", just
> positive or negative. If you have reasons not to send your
> response to the list, you may send it directly to me.
>
> I plan to make the call mid-next week.
>
> /Loa