RE: Last call : draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt

It shouldn't be necessary (since this has already been discussed), but for the 
record, I reiterate supporting the current contents of this draft.

Thanks,
Andy

-----Original Message-----
From:   Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@xxxxx]
Sent:   Tue 5/6/2003 5:08 PM
To:     Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Cc:     Adrian Farrel; 'mpls@xxxxxx'; George Swallow; zinin@xxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: Last call : draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt
All,

I beg to differ - normally at least I keep quite if I don't have any
comments, so I regard "no comments" as good news.

However since our AD has this opinion I would like to invite also
positive comments and support. I recall that I did so once before,
(and at that time got good suport) but never mind...

Show your habd once more.

/Loa

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> I assume many people will already know that "we did NOT see ANY comments"
> is in my view BAD news. We would like people to express that they
> read the doc, understood it and find it good and usefull stuff.
> 
> Silence might also mean "nobody gives a shoot" and so that in my view
> then translates in "we're wasting cycles, bits, paper... etc"
> 
> Sorry for my rant.
> Bert 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:afarrel@xxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: maandag 28 april 2003 15:06
>>To: 'mpls@xxxxxx'
>>Cc: George Swallow; Loa Andersson; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); zinin@xxxxxxx
>>Subject: Last call : draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>I didn't see any comments on this draft during the last call 
>>period. Can we move
>>it along now please?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Adrian
>>
>>
>>>This message begins an MPLS Workgroup last call on
>>>
>>> Applicability Statement for Restart Mechanisms for LDP
>>>   draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-restart-applic-00.txt
>>>
>>>The last call closes 4/14 24:00 GMT.
>>>
>>>...George
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
/Loa

mobile + 46 739 81 21 64
email: loa@xxxxx