Alex> However, if a discussion on a specific part of the document has been
Alex> triggered within the WG and the consensus was to change the text, the
Alex> editors need to do this.
Sure. One should not ignore the WG consensus. That point is that that is
not the same as saying you can't modify the document without first obtaining
WG consensus. The latter would require that consensus be obtained on every
revision, which I don't think has ever been part of the process.
Or is reasonable given the number of changes sometimes
done to documents! Anyway, the edited document is always fair
game after it is updated and published in the ID repository, and
will not proceed past WG last call unless there is consensus
on the document. So back to the original point, IMHO it does
seem as though Stewart is well within the letter of the law on
this one.
--Tom
http://www.elsevier-international.com/catalogue/title.cfm?ISBN=155860751X
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
