ietf.mip6 (thread)

[issue89] Use of PAD and SPD representation, Vijay Devarapalli
Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Steven M. Bellovin
  - Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
    - Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Steven M. Bellovin
[issue88] Security Directorate (Pasi Eronen) reivew, Vijay Devarapalli
Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay K. Gurbani
- Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Vijay Devarapalli
  - Re: Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Alexandru Petrescu
    - Re: Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Vijay Devarapalli
    - Re: Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Alexandru Petrescu
    - Re: Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Vijay Devarapalli
    - Re: Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Alexandru Petrescu
  - RE: Dealing with INTERNAL_ADDRESS_FAILURE (was Re: Re: Gen-ARTreview of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt), Kilian Weniger
Call for Papers IEEE NetCri 07, Elsharnouby, Tamer
Call for Papers: MOBIQUITOUS 2007, Antonio Capone
CFP: ACM MobiCom 2007, September 4-9 2007, Montreal, QC, Canada, Pedro M. Ruiz
RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Kent Leung \(kleung\)
[issue87] Comment by Sam Hartman on I-D draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps, admin
- Re: [issue87] Comment by Sam Hartman on I-D draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps, Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [issue87] Comment by Sam Hartman on I-D draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps, QIU Ying
- Re: [issue87] Comment by Sam Hartman on I-D draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps, QIU Ying
[issue86] Review by Tero Kivinen <kivinen@xxxxxx>, admin
[issue85] IANA review by Yoshiko Chong via RT <iana-drafts@xxxxxxxxx>, admin
[issue84] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, admin
[issue83] secdir review of draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, admin
[issue82] Secdir review of draft-mip6-location-privacy-ps-04, admin
[issue81] Comment by Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, admin
[issue80] Review by Dan Romascanu <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx>, admin
[issue79] Review by Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, admin
Design team for working on MIP6 firewall solution, Basavaraj Patil
RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Kent Leung \(kleung\)
- Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Vijay Devarapalli
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
  - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Gerardo Giaretta
    - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
    - AW: [Dime] RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Tschofenig, Hannes
    - RE: [Dime] RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
    - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - Re: [Dime] RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Julien Bournelle
    - RE: [Dime] RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
  - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
- Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Chowdhury, Kuntal
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Tsirtsis, George
  - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
  - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
    - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - AW: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Tschofenig, Hannes
    - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Gerardo Giaretta
    - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, john.loughney
RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Mohamed Khalil
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Mohamed Khalil
Reposting: Using the last Accepted Sequence Number in BA, Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: Reposting: Using the last Accepted Sequence Number in BA, Vijay Devarapalli
RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Hirschman, Brent B [CTO]
Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Gopal Dommety \(gdommety\)
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Narayanan, Vidya
  - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Ahmad Muhanna
  - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Madjid Nakhjiri
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Vijay Devarapalli
  - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Basavaraj Patil
    - Re: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Vijay Devarapalli
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Ram O V Vishnu-A14676
- RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Haseeb Akhtar
  - RE: Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?, Haseeb Akhtar
Sample packet capture, Rohan Sen
Re: On a network-mobility solution based on Mobile IPv6, wenson
3GPP2 Correspondence to IETF on netlmm, Thomas Narten
- Re: [netlmm] 3GPP2 Correspondence to IETF on netlmm, Alexandru Petrescu
CFP NetCri-07, Elsharnouby, Tamer
[Fwd: Last call comments for draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07], Vijay Devarapalli
WG meeting slides now available, Basavaraj Patil
Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios, Fred Baker
Last call comments for draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07, Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Last call comments for draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07, Sam Hartman
- Re: Last call comments for draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07, Vijay Devarapalli
  - RE: Last call comments for draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07, Pasi.Eronen
    - Re: Last call comments for draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07, Vijay Devarapalli
Review of the draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Tero Kivinen
- Re: Review of the draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
  - RE: Re: Review of the draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: Re: Review of the draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
    - MIP6 Firewall Traversal Design Team, Hannes Tschofenig
  - Re: Review of the draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Tero Kivinen
    - Re: Review of the draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt, Vijay Devarapalli
Some comments on draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Narayanan, Vidya
- Re: Some comments on draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Gerardo Giaretta
- Re: Some comments on draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Vijay Devarapalli
  - Re: Some comments on draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Lakshminath Dondeti
    - Re: Some comments on draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Vijay Devarapalli
    - Re: Some comments on draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Julien Laganier
  - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Julien Laganier
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Julien Laganier
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
    - RE: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Templin, Fred L
    - RE: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Julien Laganier
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Julien Laganier
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution for NETLMMrequireiments?, Sri Gundavelli
    - Re: [netlmm] Re: Why is PMIP a superior solution forNETLMMrequireiments?, James Kempf
Re: [Dime] Fwd: WG LC for I-d: draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Gerardo Giaretta
- RE: [Dime] Fwd: WG LC for I-d: draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Madjid Nakhjiri
  - Re: [Dime] Fwd: WG LC for I-d: draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Gerardo Giaretta
    - RE: [Dime] Fwd: WG LC for I-d: draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Madjid Nakhjiri
RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Zhang, Qiang [NTK]
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Soliman, Hesham
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Zhang, Qiang [NTK]
  - Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Vijay Devarapalli
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Soliman, Hesham
RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Soliman, Hesham
  - Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Alexandru Petrescu
  - Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), RYUJI WAKIKAWA
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
  - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Soliman, Hesham
  - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Soliman, Hesham
  - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Soliman, Hesham
  - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6?, Soliman, Hesham
- Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6?, Vijay Devarapalli
RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhentraversingIPv4 NAT, Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
- RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhentraversingIPv4 NAT, Soliman, Hesham
RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be used whentraversingIPv4 NAT, Soliman, Hesham
- Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be used whentraversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
Comments for draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Comments for draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Gerardo Giaretta
  - Re: Comments for draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03, Yoshihiro Ohba
RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not beusedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Soliman, Hesham
Resolution: [issue66] Setting up forwarding for IPv4 HoA, Soliman, Hesham
RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Narayanan, Vidya
- Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
- RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Soliman, Hesham
  - Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
    - RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
    - RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
    - What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6?, Vijay Devarapalli
    - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6?, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6?, Vijay Devarapalli
    - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6?, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), RYUJI WAKIKAWA
    - RE: What are we protecting over IPv4 in DS-MIP6? (RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT), Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
    - RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Narayanan, Vidya
    - Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be usedwhen traversingIPv4 NAT, Vijay Devarapalli
Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Yoshihiro Ohba
  - Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Vijay Devarapalli
    - Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Gerardo Giaretta
- Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Gerardo Giaretta
- Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Gerardo Giaretta
  - Re: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: WG LC: Yoshihiro Ohba's review, Vijay Devarapalli
RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be used when traversingIPv4 NAT, Soliman, Hesham
- Re: RE: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be used when traversingIPv4 NAT, Sri Gundavelli
- Re: concensus: issue 76: Alt CoA should not be used when traversingIPv4 NAT, Wassim Haddad