Personally, I suspect that 4285 support simply needs a bunch of attributes.
I suggest people propose a couple of requirements related to 4285 support
and after that we could easily see if those can be added to the current set
of goals. Once we did that we can simply say the HA-AAAH support 4285.
Madjid
-----Original Message-----
From: Kent Leung (kleung) [mailto:kleung@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:08 PM
To: Vijay Devarapalli; Gopal Dommety (gdommety)
Cc: mip6@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Mip6] Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC
4285inthe draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
My vote is YES.
I assume this question is intended for HA-AAA interface support for RFC
4285. But it would be definitely nice to have standards-based AAA
attributes for bootstrapping in terms of completeness.
Kent
-----Original Message-----
From: Vijay Devarapalli [mailto:vijay.devarapalli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:26 AM
To: Gopal Dommety (gdommety)
Cc: mip6@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Mip6] Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC
4285in the draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
Gopal,
lets step back a bit. what is the point of adding of 4285-specific
requirements in draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals? is it just for basic
4285 operation where the HA-AAAH interface is used for MN
authentication? or does it include bootstrapping for 4285 too?
will the requirements be added to
draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03 just to capture all the requirements in
one place with no binding to develop any solutions yet?
other bootstrapping related questions, do we want to standardize
bootstrapping solutions for 4285 too? has the DIME WG agreed to
developing solutions for 4285-based MIP6 operation?
Vijay
Gopal Dommety (gdommety) wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Wanted to get the MIP6 Working groups preference on whether we
> should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the
> draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03
>
> We would like to hear the Working Groups opinion of the following
question:
>
> Should we add the requirements that arise from RFC 4285 in the
> draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03?
>
> Please answer "yes" or "no" PS: In the IETF Mip6 WG meeting there
> were
> 14 people for "yes" and 5 for "No".
>
> Cheers,
> Gopal and Raj
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mip6 mailing list
> Mip6@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
