RE: FW: Internal WG Review: Recharter ofMobility for IPv4(mip4)

 > > => Huh? what do you mean by "scale"?
 > 
 > I mean an IPv6-only network is very large.  If only its 
 > borders support
 > IPv4 and IPv6 then all routers inside can't be HAs whose 
 > nodes attach to
 > IPv4-only networks.

=> Please tell me exactly what the scalability concerns are. I can't
follow the above.


 > It is still possible to have a MIP6 MN with an IPv4 stack, 
 > connecting to
 > an IPv4-only network, use NAT traversal, and its operator 
 > not be forced
 > to dual-stack all the HAs, just a "gateway" farm.  And that is not
 > DS-MIPv6, and no NAT.

=> You're right that's not DSMIPv6. We chose a different path, which
achieves the same result. Instead of requiring a "gateway farm" we reuse
the HA. 

Hesham



 > 
 > Alex
 >