|
|
July 12, 2006
- Re: The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hector Santos
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker
- The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- selectors, _policy._domainkey, Tony Hansen
- NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Michael Thomas
- RE: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Bill.Oxley
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR
- Re: plain-text and g=, Eric Allman
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eric Allman
July 11, 2006
- Re: draft text for specify IANA instructions, Tony Hansen
- plain-text and g=, Tony Hansen
- draft text for specify IANA instructions, Dave Crocker
- draft text for specify IANA instructions, Dave Crocker
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Douglas Otis
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR
- Re: review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Hector Santos
- review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR
July 10, 2006
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Steve Atkins
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Michael Thomas
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Barry Leiba
- RE: Comments on -overview document?, Bill.Oxley
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Eliot Lear
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Michael Thomas
- [Fwd: DKIM - ROOM CHANGE], stephen . farrell
- RE: Comments on -overview document?, Bill.Oxley
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Douglas Otis
- Re: Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Eric Allman
- Re: Consistency among keys using q= alternatives, Eric Allman
- RE: Comments on -overview document?, Bill.Oxley
July 07, 2006
- Re: dots in selectors, Eric Allman
- Re: dots in selectors, Mark Delany
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Eric Allman
- Re: editorials and nits, Eric Rescorla
- dots in selectors, Eric Allman
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
- Re: new issue: more details of key record format in base, Eric Allman
- Re: editorials and nits, Eric Allman
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Eliot Lear
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Hector Santos
- Re: editorials and nits, Eric Allman
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Eliot Lear
July 06, 2006
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Douglas Otis
- Re: DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Dave Crocker
- Re: DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Paul Hoffman
- Working-Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dkim-base-03, Barry Leiba
- Re: IANA considerations..., Tony Hansen
- Re: CNAME's, John Levine
- Re: CNAME's, Mark Delany
- Re: CNAME's, David Mayne
- Re: CNAME's, John Levine
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman
- Re: DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Douglas Otis
- Re: CNAME's, David Mayne
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Dave Crocker
July 05, 2006
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Paul Hoffman
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Jim Fenton
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman
- DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Douglas Otis
- jabber, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Jim Fenton
- Re: CNAME's, Mark Delany
- Re: CNAME's, Steve Atkins
- Re: CNAME's, Michael Thomas
- Re: editorials and nits, John Levine
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Douglas Otis
- Re: CNAME's + multiple selector labels, Douglas Otis
- Re: CNAME's, Eliot Lear
- Re: CNAME's, Steve Atkins
- Re: CNAME's, Mark Delany
- Re: CNAME's, Mark Delany
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Michael Thomas
- Re: CNAME's, Michael Thomas
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Mark Delany
- Re: CNAME's, Peter Koch
- Re: CNAME's, Mark Delany
- Re: editorials and nits, Jim Fenton
- Re: Re: CNAME's, Eliot Lear
- Re: Re: CNAME's, Eliot Lear
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Jim Fenton
July 04, 2006
- Re: CNAME's, John L
- Re: editorials and nits, John Levine
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Michael Thomas
- CNAME's, Michael Thomas
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, John Levine
- Reference to ID-AUTH-RES (was Re: editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman
- DKIM TTPs (was Re: editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman
- new issue: more details of key record format in base, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Eric Rescorla
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Peter Koch
- Re: editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Eric Rescorla
- Re: editorials and nits, Michael Thomas
- Re: section 5 rewrite?, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
- Re: editorials and nits, Eliot Lear
- Re: editorials and nits, Jim Fenton
- Re: editorials and nits, Tony Hansen
- Re: dkim-base-03 key-*-tag minor issues, Eric Allman
- Re: section 5 rewrite?, Eric Allman
- Re: editorials and nits, Eric Allman
July 02, 2006
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Stephen Farrell
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Mark Delany
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Michael Thomas
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Michael Thomas
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Paul Hoffman
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Michael Thomas
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Stephen Farrell
- Re: bh=; l=0;, Paul Hoffman
- Re: is s= really needed?, Stephen Farrell
- Re: is s= really needed?, Michael Thomas
- bh=; l=0;, Michael Thomas
- dkim-base-03 key-*-tag minor issues, SUZUKI Takahiko
- Re: Misc. fairly minor issues, Paul Hoffman
- Re: editorials and nits, Paul Hoffman
- Re: section 5 rewrite?, Paul Hoffman
- Re: IANA considerations..., Paul Hoffman
- Re: is s= really needed?, Paul Hoffman
|
|