|
|
June 27, 2006
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Mark Delany
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Tony Hansen
- agenda slots..., Stephen Farrell
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Mark Delany
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Jon Callas
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Douglas Otis
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, J.D. Falk
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, Jon Callas
- Re: Relaxed body canonicalization, John Levine
June 22, 2006
- Re: Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis
- Re: Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, Michael Thomas
- Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, Barry Leiba
- Re: Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Dave Crocker
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
- issue 1287 (signature removal), Eric Allman
- Re: Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis
- Re: Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Michael Thomas
- Re: Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Eric Allman
- Re: Use of "sender" in -base, Eric Allman
- Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis
- [Fwd: DKIM - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 66], Stephen Farrell
- Re: Use of "sender" in -base, Tony Hansen
- Re: Use of "sender" in -base, Dave Crocker
- Jabber meeting for 22 June, Barry Leiba
June 16, 2006
- RE: Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Paul Hoffman
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis
- RE: Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis
- Re: auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Dave Crocker
- Re: Clarification on z=, Eric Allman
- Re: auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Dave Crocker
- Re: draft-dkim-pcon, Douglas Otis
- RE: draft-dkim-pcon, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: draft-dkim-pcon, Douglas Otis
- RE: Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Paul Hoffman
- RE: draft-dkim-pcon, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Jim Fenton
June 14, 2006
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Douglas Otis
- Re: Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Steve Atkins
- Re: Clarification on z=, Michael Thomas
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, John Levine
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Michael Thomas
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Jim Fenton
- Re: Clarification on z=, Eric Allman
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Steve Atkins
- Re: Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, J.D. Falk
- Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Jim Fenton
- Last Call: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dkim-threats), The IESG
June 10, 2006
- Re: Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Clarification on z=, Michael Thomas
- Re: Clarification on z=, Michael Thomas
- Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Paul Hoffman
- Re: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx vs. user@xxxxxxxxxxx, was Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx vs. user@xxxxxxxxxxx, was Underscore considerations, John Levine
June 09, 2006
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: Underscore considerations, John Levine
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton
- Re: Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas
- Re: Underscore considerations, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton
- Re: Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell
- RE: Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Jim Fenton
- Re: Underscore considerations, Stephen Farrell
- Re: issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Michael Thomas
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- RE: Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Tony Hansen
- RE: Underscore considerations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Underscore considerations, John Levine
- Re: issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, John Levine
- issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Tony Hansen
- Re: Underscore considerations, Steve Atkins
- Re: Underscore considerations, Eliot Lear
- Re: Underscore considerations, Steve Atkins
- Re: Issues needing tracking, Eliot Lear
- Re: Underscore considerations, Paul Hoffman
- Re: Underscore considerations, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Stephen Farrell
- RE: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: Issues needing tracking, Douglas Otis
- Re: Issues needing tracking, Eliot Lear
- RE: Underscore considerations, Bill.Oxley
- Re: Issue 1287: signature removal, Michael Thomas
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: Issue 1287: signature removal, John L
- Re: Issue 1287: signature removal, Michael Thomas
- Issue 1287: signature removal, John Levine
- Re: Underscore considerations, SM
- Re: Underscore considerations, Dave Crocker
- Re: Underscore considerations, Paul Hoffman
- Re: Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Dave Crocker
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas
- Re: Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Michael Thomas
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas
- Re: Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Jim Fenton
- Re: Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Dave Crocker
- Re: Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton
- Re: Underscore considerations, Dave Crocker
- Re: Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton
- Re: Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas
- Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Jim Fenton
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- base-02 // Parent signing security considerations/ summation, Douglas Otis
- Re: Underscore considerations, Paul Hoffman
June 08, 2006
- Re: Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis
- Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton
- Re: Issues needing tracking, Douglas Otis
- Re: Issues needing tracking, Stephen Farrell
- Issues needing tracking, Douglas Otis
- Re: Use of "sender" in -base, Dave Crocker
- Re: Use of "sender" in -base, Paul Hoffman
- base progressing towards WG last call, Stephen Farrell
- Use of "sender" in -base, Dave Crocker
- RE: base-02 // worst-case scenario/duration of exploit/useof deprecated, Douglas Otis
- Re: jabber again today, Douglas Otis
- RE: base-02 // worst-case scenario/duration of exploit/useof deprecated, Bill.Oxley
- nit: section 6.1, Eliot Lear
- jabber again today, Barry Leiba
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Barry Leiba
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell
- Re: base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Douglas Otis
- base-02 // "b=" tag deletion only on the signature created or verified, Douglas Otis
- Re: base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Michael Thomas
- Re: base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Paul Hoffman
- base-02 // worst-case scenario/duration of exploit/use of deprecated, Douglas Otis
- base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Douglas Otis
June 07, 2006
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Jim Fenton
- Re: auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell
- Re: auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Jim Fenton
- Re: auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, John R Levine
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Michael Thomas
- Re: Montreal agenda, other than base, Paul Hoffman
- Re: Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Douglas Otis
- Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Tony Hansen
- Re: Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Douglas Otis
- Re: Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Eliot Lear
- Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Douglas Otis
June 05, 2006
- Re: Section 6 rewording, Michael Thomas
- Section 6 rewording, Jim Fenton
- Rework of sections 6 and 7, Eric Allman
- Re: Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, Stephen Farrell
- RE: Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, william(at)elan.net
- RE: Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, Bill.Oxley
- Re: Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, Barry Leiba
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Douglas Otis
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Michael Thomas
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Douglas Otis
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Eliot Lear
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Michael Thomas
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Eliot Lear
- Re: Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Eliot Lear
- Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //a= algorithm ABNF, Paul Hoffman
- Re: draft changes discussed in Thursday Jabber session, Barry Leiba
- draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //a= algorithm ABNF, Douglas Otis
June 01, 2006
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Michael Thomas
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis
- RE: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Bill.Oxley
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Paul Hoffman
- RE: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Bill.Oxley
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Eliot Lear
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, william(at)elan.net
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Stephen Farrell
- draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis
- Today's jabber log..., Stephen Farrell
- today's jabber agenda, Stephen Farrell
- Re: base-03: Key lookup parameters, Eric Allman
- Re: base-02: Normative order of verification steps, Eric Allman
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 typos?, Eric Allman
- jabbering today..., Stephen Farrell
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 typos?, Douglas Otis
- draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Signing Address, Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //i= parameter, Douglas Otis
- RE: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //i= parameter, Bill.Oxley
- draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Signature Expiration Recommendation, Douglas Otis
- draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // unverifiable signature removal, Douglas Otis
- draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //i= parameter, Douglas Otis
|
|
