ietf.dkim (date)

ietf.dkim (date)

May 31, 2006

draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //g= template, Douglas Otis
base-03: Key lookup parameters, Jim Fenton
draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 typos?, Douglas Otis
base-02: Normative order of verification steps, Jim Fenton
base-02: Verifier result codes, Jim Fenton
base -02: Nits and other minor comments, Jim Fenton
draft-ietf-dkim-threats-03, Douglas Otis

May 30, 2006

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-threats-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
Re: -base section 5.2: key timeouts, Dave Crocker
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John Levine
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Steve Atkins
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Barry Leiba

May 29, 2006

jabber topics..., Stephen Farrell
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 submitted, Dave Crocker
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Eric Allman
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Stephen Farrell
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis

May 28, 2006

Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Dave Crocker
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John R Levine

May 27, 2006

Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Michael Thomas
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Paul Hoffman
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Steve Atkins
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Dave Crocker
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, william(at)elan.net
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Paul Hoffman
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
New version of -threats document, Jim Fenton
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Paul Hoffman

May 26, 2006

Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John R Levine
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Mark Delany
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John Levine
Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Jim Fenton

May 25, 2006

Re: New signature algorithm deployment amidst non-updated verifiers, Paul Hoffman
New signature algorithm deployment amidst non-updated verifiers, Douglas Otis
Summary of jabber meeting on 2006-05-25, Barry Leiba
-base section 5.2: key timeouts, Eric Allman
Today's jabber in about 30 minutes..., Stephen Farrell
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //Deprecating keys and confirming algorithms, Douglas Otis
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //Deprecating keys and confirming algorithms, Russ Housley
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //Deprecating keys and confirming algorithms, Stephen Farrell
draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //Deprecating keys and confirming algorithms, Douglas Otis

May 24, 2006

Re: Issue #1184, 1196, 1271, Stephen Farrell
Re: Issue #1184, 1196, 1271, Douglas Otis
Re: Issue #1184, 1196, 1271, Paul Hoffman
Re: Issue #1184, 1196, 1271, Douglas Otis

May 23, 2006

Re: Issue #1184, 1196, 1271, Stephen Farrell
Issue #1184, 1196, 1271, Douglas Otis
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 submitted, Arvel Hathcock
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
RE: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 submitted, Bill.Oxley
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 submitted, Eric Allman
Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 submitted, Hector Santos
Re: weekly jabbering?, Stephen Farrell
draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 submitted, Eric Allman

May 22, 2006

Re: weekly jabbering?, Douglas Otis
Re: weekly jabbering?, Stephen Farrell
Re: weekly jabbering?, Michael Thomas

May 21, 2006

Re: weekly jabbering?, Jim Fenton
Re: weekly jabbering?, Dave Crocker
Re: weekly jabbering?, John Levine

May 20, 2006

weekly jabbering?, Stephen Farrell

May 19, 2006

Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Stephen Farrell
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Eric Allman
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Douglas Otis
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Stephen Farrell
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Paul Hoffman
Re: Today's jabber, william(at)elan.net
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Paul Hoffman
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber, John Levine

May 18, 2006

Re: Today's jabber, Douglas Otis
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber, Douglas Otis
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber #1271: Binary algorithms and algorithm spoofing during a transition., Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber #1271: Binary algorithms and algorithm spoofing during a transition., Douglas Otis
Re: Today's jabber, Tony Hansen
Re: Today's jabber, william(at)elan.net
Re: Today's jabber #1271: Binary algorithms and algorithm spoofing during a transition., Eric Allman
Re: Today's jabber #1271: Binary algorithms and algorithm spoofing during a transition., Douglas Otis
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber, Eric Allman
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber, John Levine
Re: Today's jabber, Mark Delany
Re: Today's jabber, Eric Allman
Re: Today's jabber, Douglas Otis
Re: Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session), Arvel Hathcock
RE: Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session), Eric Allman
Re: Today's jabber, william(at)elan.net
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
Re: Today's jabber, Tony Hansen
Re: Today's jabber, Tony Hansen
Re: Today's jabber, Tony Hansen
Re: Today's jabber, Michael Thomas
RE: Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session), Bill.Oxley
Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session), Eric Allman
Re: Today's jabber, Eric Allman
Re: Today's jabber, Dave Crocker
Re: Jabber meeting..., Mark Delany
Re: Today's jabber, Mark Delany
Re: Today's jabber, Tony Hansen
Jabber meeting..., Stephen Farrell
Today's jabber in about 30 minutes..., Stephen Farrell
Re: Issues list, Stephen Farrell

May 17, 2006

Re: Issues list, Eric Allman
ietf jabber rooms, Dave Crocker
Re: Issues list, Dave Crocker
Re: Issues list, Paul Hoffman
Re: Issues list, Eric Allman
Re: Issues list, Stephen Farrell
Re: Issues list, Eric Allman
Re: Issues list, Michael Thomas
#1196: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Douglas Otis
Reducing threat impact, Douglas Otis

May 16, 2006

Re: Issues list, Stephen Farrell
Re: Issues list, Michael Thomas
Re: Issues list, Stephen Farrell
Issues list, Stephen Farrell

May 10, 2006

DKIM Signing Domain Reliance Level, Douglas Otis

May 05, 2006

Re: Requesting progression of DKIM threats draft..., Stephen Farrell
Requesting progression of DKIM threats draft..., Stephen Farrell

May 04, 2006

Re: Tomorrow's jabber chat?, Stephen Farrell
Tomorrow's jabber chat?, John Levine

May 03, 2006

Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, J.D. Falk
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Paul Hoffman
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Dave Crocker
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Dave Crocker

May 02, 2006

Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Jim Fenton
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Mark Delany
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Hector Santos
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Michael Thomas
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Mark Delany
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Jim Fenton

May 01, 2006

Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis
Re: Type in Section 6.3, Eric Allman
Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Eric Allman
Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Jim Fenton
Type in Section 6.3, Arvel Hathcock
Re: dkim-base-01: ABNF discrepancies, Tony Hansen
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, John L
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Hector Santos
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis
Re: dkim-base-01: ABNF discrepancies, Eric Allman
Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits, Eric Allman
Re: Re: What the verifier can do, Hector Santos
Re: Re: What the verifier can do, Paul Hoffman
Re: Re: What the verifier can do, Tony Hansen
Re: Re: What the verifier can do, Eric Rescorla
Re: Re: What the verifier can do, Michael Thomas
RE: When i= domain != d= domain, Bill.Oxley

News | FAQ | advertise