logo       

Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices: msg#00583

ietf.dkim

Subject: Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices

> The text for the r= parameter indicated that as the number increases,
> the recommended annotation levels made by the signer also increase.

Indeed, but we still have no idea how that translates into making a
reputation decision.

> The assurance being made by the signer has _nothing_ to due with
> reputation. This r= parameter relates to annotation recommendations
> made by the signing domain for a particular message.

Oh, in that case, I have no interest in r values less than infinity, and I
don't think anyone else should, either. If a signer isn't prepared to
take responsibility for the mail they sign, they have no business signing
it.

R's,
John


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise