Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits

> My only concern is to ensure we're not prescriptive to a
> verifier. Anywhere we say "reject" probably should be changed to
> "treat as unsigned" as long as there is no implication one way or the
> other as to what a verifier does with that "is verified" or "is not
> verified" knowledge.

Thank you.  We keep confusing the base signing/validating specification 
with larger policy uses of a signature. 

We really need to keep the base specification a simple, narrow and 
mechanical as possible.

d/

--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>