|
Re: Re: dkim-base-01: Section 6.2 Get the Public Key: msg#00577ietf.dkim
Eric Allman wrote: What I did for this was to add something to 6.1 reading "Verifiers MAY ignore the DKIM-Signature header field if it contains an "x=" tag and the signature has expired." I then added to the end of 6.1 "If there are no valid signatures remaining after this step, a verifier MUST NOT proceed to the next step." If we are to keep the x= parameter, this change to the text strikes me as an extremely constructive navigation of the challenges to its use. and lest my wording be confusing: +1. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://bbiw.net> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Body Length mechanism rejections: 00577, Paul Hoffman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | What the verifier can do (was: z= question with X headers ): 00577, Paul Hoffman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dkim-base-01: Section 6.2 Get the Public Keyi: 00577, Eric Allman |
| Next by Thread: | dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error: 00577, Hector Santos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |