|
Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices: msg#00572ietf.dkim
>> Administrators 9 >> Transactional email 8 >> Permanent Employees 7 >> Automated messages 6 >> Mailing lists 5 >> Domain Users 4 >> Bulk 3 >> Proxy Service 2 >> Transparent Service 1 >> Guests 0 >This seems to me to be a poor man's version of SSP, ... The whole issue of mail categories is an interesting one, but it's a large, deep, chewy can of worms relevant to much more than DKIM that we'd be nuts to try to address here. Those of us who are nuts are welcome to reconvene in the ASRG where it's already a topic of occasional discussion. R's, John |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices: 00572, Eliot Lear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices: 00572, Douglas Otis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practicesi: 00572, Eliot Lear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: r= for instilling good domain-name practices: 00572, Douglas Otis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |