Re: Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits

> >Section 3.4.5 second to last paragraph "choose to reject" ->
> >"choose to ignore signatures"  [this one isn't a nit]
> 
> I'm not sure we have consensus on dropping the "reject" language --- 
> I think Mark had some concerns.  I'll add wording about ignoring the 
> signature though.

My only concern is to ensure we're not prescriptive to a
verifier. Anywhere we say "reject" probably should be changed to
"treat as unsigned" as long as there is no implication one way or the
other as to what a verifier does with that "is verified" or "is not
verified" knowledge.

Similarly, there should be no "accept" language.

In general, verifier actions are out of scope.


Mark.