|
Re: Body Length mechanism rejections: msg#00557ietf.dkim
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:25:53PM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote: > Eric Allman wrote: > > >>>>| 3.4.5 Body Length Limits > >>>>| ... > >>>>| Note that verifiers MAY choose to reject or truncate messages > >>>>| that have body content beyond that specified by the body length > >>>>| count. > >>>> > >>>>change to: > >>>> > >>>>: Note that verifiers MAY choose to truncate messages that have > >>>>: body content beyond that specified by the body length count. > >>> > > > >Paul and Jim seem to agree --- others? Is this meaning to say that a verifier can't reject a mail if the length mis-matches? That seems like something rather hard to enforce. I also don't know the context this is in. Is it only relevant if a verify is checking l= or in all cases? Mark. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: When i= domain != d= domain: 00557, Dave Crocker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: z= question with X headers: 00557, Hector Santos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Body Length mechanism rejectionsi: 00557, Michael Thomas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Body Length mechanism rejections: 00557, Douglas Otis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |