Re: When i= domain != d= domain: msg#00556

ietf.dkim

Subject:	Re: When i= domain != d= domain

Arvel Hathcock wrote:

> It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible
> remedies would be more useful.

This makes sense to me as well.

+1

d/

--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: z= question with X headers: 00556, Tony Hansen
Next by Date:	Re: Body Length mechanism rejections: 00556, Mark Delany
Previous by Thread:	Re: When i= domain != d= domaini: 00556, Jim Fenton
Next by Thread:	Re: When i= domain != d= domain: 00556, Eric Allman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]