|
Re: When i= domain != d= domain: msg#00544ietf.dkim
> It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible phoffman> Fully agree. arvel> This makes sense to me as well. So is there consensus that this change belongs in -02? eric |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: z= question with X headers: 00544, Eric Allman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Body Length mechanism rejections: 00544, Eric Allman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: When i= domain != d= domaini: 00544, Arvel Hathcock |
| Next by Thread: | Re: When i= domain != d= domain: 00544, Michael Thomas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |