Re: Body Length mechanism rejections

Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 9:20 AM -0700 4/25/06, Douglas Otis wrote:
>> ,---
>> |3.4.5  Body Length Limits
>> |...
>> | Note that verifiers MAY choose to reject or truncate messages that
>> | have body content beyond that specified by the body length count.
>> '___
>>
>> change to:
>>
>> : Note that verifiers MAY choose to truncate messages that have body
>> : content beyond that specified by the body length count.
>>
>> While use of l= should be depreciated, it seems disruptive to have
>> this mechanism possibly induce the rejection of messages.  The
>> general goal should have all DKIM compliant MTA make the same basic
>> choice of whether a mechanism is acceptable or not.
>
> Agree. This is the only place where rejecting the message based on
> verification faults is mentioned.
Also agree with the part about not mentioning rejection of messages.

-Jim