Re: Proposal for v= tag

Mircea Purdea wrote:

> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> > I guess my concern would be that it might encourage people not to
> > update their code to be RFC compliant.
>
>
> That might be so, but on the other hand, I think that before commiting 
> to a RFC, live testing of draft implementations SHOULD be done, and 
> currently, given the v= situation, this is nigh impossible...

Well, I just went and implemented -01 yesterday and I'm not having a 
problem supporting
the previous versions. We may yet have a situation where we can't do 
that, but thus far
we haven't. Considering that the draft seems to be converging, I'd say 
that waiting for
it to track rfc's seems like a reasonable thing to do.

      Mike