|
Re: Proposal for v= tag: msg#00483ietf.dkim
Stephen Farrell wrote: I guess my concern would be that it might encourage people not to That might be so, but on the other hand, I think that before commiting to a RFC, live testing of draft implementations SHOULD be done, and currently, given the v= situation, this is nigh impossible... Mircea |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Proposal for v= tag: 00483, Stephen Farrell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Proposal for v= tag: 00483, Michael Thomas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proposal for v= tagi: 00483, Stephen Farrell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Proposal for v= tag: 00483, Michael Thomas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |