ietf.dkim (thread)

Amplification attack solution., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targetsfor spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net
- RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net
- RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net
Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net
- Re: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Jim Fenton
  - Re: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Douglas Otis
  - Re: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, stephen . farrell
Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, John Levine
  - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed
    - Re: Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Tony Hansen
    - Re: Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Steve Atkins
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Wietse Venema
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Scott Kitterman
  - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Tony Hansen
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton
  - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Mark Delany
    - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Douglas Otis
- RE: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Scott Kitterman
- RE: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
signature h= and z= tags, Hector Santos
- Re: signature h= and z= tags, Hector Santos
  - Re: signature h= and z= tags, Frank Ellermann
authentification-results draft?, Tony Hansen
- Re: authentification-results draft?, J.D. Falk
  - Re: authentification-results draft?, Tony Hansen
- Re: authentification-results draft?, Michael Thomas
  - Re: authentification-results draft?, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: authentification-results draft?, Tony Hansen
International Conference on Network Security 2006, Robert Holliday
Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Stephen Farrell
- Re: Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Dave Crocker
  - Re: Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Arvel Hathcock
  - Re: Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Stephen Farrell
- Open Issues at this time, Eliot Lear
Please resend: any mail send to me after 8am Monday., Dave Crocker
issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Tony Hansen
- Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Michael Thomas
  - Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Michael Thomas
    - Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Frank Ellermann
agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Tony Hansen
- Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Tony Hansen
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell
- Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
    - No new PKIs! (was: Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Stephen Farrell
    - Re: No new PKIs! (was: Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Douglas Otis
    - Re: No new PKIs! (was: Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Mark Delany
    - Re: No new PKIs! (was: Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Douglas Otis
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Ned Freed
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Mark Delany
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Michael Thomas
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Mark Delany
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Tony Hansen
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Scott Kitterman
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Mark Delany
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, John Levine
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, John R Levine
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Dave Crocker
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Dave Crocker
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Steve Atkins
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Dave Crocker
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis
- RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, John R Levine
    - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos
another try at my question on options in TXT records, Tony Hansen
- Re: another try at my question on options in TXT records, Dave Crocker
- Re: another try at my question on options in TXT records, Mark Delany
  - New Issue: extensions to the RR, Eliot Lear
  - Re: another try at my question on options in TXT records, Tony Hansen
    - Re: another try at my question on options in TXT records, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: another try at my question on options in TXT records, Tony Hansen
- RE: another try at my question on options in TXT records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Douglas Otis
- RE: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Douglas Otis
RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Daniel Dreymann
  - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
  - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Jon Callas
- Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Jon Callas
- RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Bill.Oxley
  - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
- RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Hector Santos
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Tony Hansen
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas
- RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear
    - Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Tony Hansen
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Tony Hansen
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Jon Callas
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Ned Freed
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Ned Freed
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Hector Santos
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Ned Freed
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Mark Delany
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Hector Santos
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Mark Delany
    - Re: Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Hector Santos
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Douglas Otis
  - RE: Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed
small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Tony Hansen
- Re: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Douglas Otis
  - Re: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Michael Thomas
    - Re: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Douglas Otis
- Re: small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Arvel Hathcock
OT: DK credits, Frank Ellermann
- Re: OT: DK credits, Jon Callas
- RE: OT: DK credits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - OT: DK credits, Frank Ellermann
Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, John Levine
- Re: Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, Stephen Farrell
New DKIM FAQ, Dave Crocker
SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Mark Delany
- Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis
- Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
  - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Mark Delany
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Hector Santos
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Hector Santos
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM
SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Mark Delany
- Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Tony Hansen
  - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Eric Allman
    - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Michael Thomas
    - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Eric Allman
    - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Michael Thomas
    - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Tony Hansen
- Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Mark Delany
    - Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, william(at)elan.net
Handling Invalid Signatures, Hector Santos
(-base document) clarifications on use of l= tag, Eric Allman
- Re: (-base document) clarifications on use of l= tag, Frank Ellermann
New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
- Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Michael Thomas
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Douglas Otis
    - Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eric Allman
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Frank Ellermann
- Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Michael Thomas
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Steve Atkins
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear
    - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear
  - Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany
New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Markley, Mike
- Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Mark Delany
- Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Douglas Otis
- Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Hector Santos
  - Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Frank Ellermann
- RE: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Markley, Mike
  - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Andrew Newton
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Michael Thomas
  - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Peter Koch
- RE: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Markley, Mike
  - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, John Levine
    - Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Douglas Otis
- RE: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Andrew Newton
New Issue: draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 - 3.4.6 Example (Canonicalization), Hector Santos
testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Tony Hansen
- Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Michael Thomas
  - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Dave Crocker
    - RE: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Bill.Oxley
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Dave Crocker
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Douglas Otis
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Douglas Otis
    - New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Michael Thomas
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Dave Crocker
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Michael Thomas
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus& question for base spec), Hector Santos
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus& question for base spec), Douglas Otis
    - Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus& question for base spec), Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Douglas Otis
  - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Tony Hansen
- Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos
  - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Mark Delany
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Mark Delany
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Jim Fenton
    - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos
- RE: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Bill.Oxley
  - Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Mark Delany
fyi- current open issues, Eliot Lear
- Re: fyi- current open issues, Douglas Otis
  - Re: fyi- current open issues, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: fyi- current open issues, Eliot Lear
RE: RFC 4387 on Internet X.509 Public Key InfrastructureOperational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: RFC 4387 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: RFC 4387 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (fwd), Mark Delany
RFC 4387 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (fwd), william(at)elan.net
dkim web page update, Dave Crocker
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 submitted, Eric Allman
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 submitted, SM
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 submitted, Mark Delany
Re: canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Attempted summary, SSP again, Arvel Hathcock
Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: Inconsistent Signature vs Policy Attacks, Jim Fenton
touting the DKIM Supporters list, Dave Crocker
New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
- Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann
- Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
  - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - RE: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Bill.Oxley
    - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Hector Santos
  - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Stephen Farrell
Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Jeff Macdonald
- Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Dave Crocker
  - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Jeff Macdonald
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Mark Delany
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Arvel Hathcock
- RE: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Bill.Oxley
  - Re: Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Dave Crocker
Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Hector Santos
- Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Hector Santos
now up on roundup tracker, Eliot Lear
- Re: now up on roundup tracker, Dave Crocker
- Re: now up on roundup tracker, Frank Ellermann
Measurement Results on Deployment Ratio of Domain Authentications, 山本和彦
- Re: Measurement Results on Deployment Ratio of Domain Authentications, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Measurement Results on Deployment Ratio of Domain Authentications, Frank Ellermann
Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, J.D. Falk
- Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Douglas Otis
Re: the Internet is inherently insecure, Frank Ellermann