ietf.dkim (thread)

A potential problem with SSP bound to From, Earl Hood
- Re: A potential problem with SSP bound to From, John Levine
  - Re: A potential problem with SSP bound to From, Hector Santos
- Re: A potential problem with SSP bound to From, Hector Santos
  - Re: A potential problem with SSP bound to From, Earl Hood
- Re: A potential problem with SSP bound to From, Michael Thomas
  - Re: A potential problem with SSP bound to From, Earl Hood
Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
- Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Dave Crocker
  - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Mark Delany
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Mark Delany
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Dave Crocker
    - Yahoo! IPR uses a direct relationship, the Opaque-identifier uses an indirect., Douglas Otis
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, John Levine
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, John Levine
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, John R Levine
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Ned Freed
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Ned Freed
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
- Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Earl Hood
  - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Hector Santos
  - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Douglas Otis
- Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Jim Fenton
- Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Eric Rescorla
    - Re: Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01, Stephen Farrell
is this a problem or not?, Stephen Farrell
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Michael Thomas
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
  - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Scott Kitterman
- Re: is this a problem or not?, John Levine
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, Dave Crocker
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, Ned Freed
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Ned Freed
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Jim Fenton
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, william(at)elan.net
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Graham Murray
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Re: is this a problem or not?, Douglas Otis
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, Scott Kitterman
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Arvel Hathcock
  - Threat: OPEN-DKIM-RELAYS, Hector Santos
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
  - Re: is this a problem or not?, Earl Hood
    - Re: is this a problem or not?, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Hector Santos
- Re: is this a problem or not?, Hector Santos
web page now includes paris audio and jabber archive pointers, Dave Crocker
- Re: web page now includes paris audio and jabber archive pointers, Dave Crocker
Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
- Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Scott Kitterman
  - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Mark Delany
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Mark Delany
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Earl Hood
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Dave Crocker
    - Resent-nit (was: Should DKIM drop SSP?), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Resent-nit (was: Should DKIM drop SSP?), Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, wayne
- RE: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Ned Freed
- re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hector Santos
  - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hector Santos
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Jeff Macdonald
- RE: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Should DKIM drop SSP?, Hector Santos
Revised charter and documents uploaded to web site, Dave Crocker
SSP and Sender header field, william(at)elan.net
- Re: SSP and Sender header field, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Earl Hood
    - Re: SSP and Sender header field, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Jim Fenton
    - Re: SSP and Sender header field, Frank Ellermann
- Re: SSP and Sender header field, Douglas Otis
- RE: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Bill.Oxley
  - Re: SSP and Sender header field, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Hector Santos
  - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Michael Thomas
  - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: SSP and Sender header field, Hector Santos
draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01.txt, Jim Fenton
- Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01.txt, Edberg, Jeremy
  - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01.txt, Douglas Otis
  - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01.txt, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01.txt, Earl Hood
  - ebay / eboy, Dave Crocker
draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, Eric Allman
- Re: draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, Douglas Otis
  - Re: draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: draft-allman-dkim-{base,ssp}-01.txt, Stephen Farrell
DKIM BOF agenda, Barry Leiba
- Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Barry Leiba
  - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Mark Delany
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Barry Leiba
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Mark Delany
- Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Dave Crocker
  - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Mark Delany
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Dave Crocker
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Mark Delany
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Eliot Lear
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Dave Crocker
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Dave Crocker
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Ned Freed
    - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Frank Ellermann
- RE: DKIM BOF agenda, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: DKIM BOF agenda, Stephen Farrell
dkim service and reputation/accreditation systems, Mike Wolf
comments on the threats draft, Stephen Farrell
- Re: comments on the threats draft, Dave Crocker
  - Re: comments on the threats draft, Stephen Farrell
- Re: comments on the threats draft, Jim Fenton
  - Re: comments on the threats draft, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: comments on the threats draft, Jim Fenton
    - Re: comments on the threats draft, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: comments on the threats draft, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: comments on the threats draft, Hector Santos
RE: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Bill.Oxley
- Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Frank Ellermann
Admilistrivia question, william(at)elan.net
- Re: Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
  - Re: Admilistrivia question, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: Admilistrivia question, Graham Murray
- Re: Admilistrivia question, Jim Fenton
  - Re: Admilistrivia question, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, John Levine
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Dave Crocker
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, John L
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Jim Fenton
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Earl Hood
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Jim Fenton
    - Re: list config, was Admilistrivia question, Hector Santos
    - Re: Admilistrivia question, Douglas Otis
- RE: Re: Admilistrivia question, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
- Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Arvel Hathcock
- Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Hector Santos
  - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Hector Santos
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Frank Ellermann
- Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Frank Ellermann
- Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Earl Hood
  - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Earl Hood
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Mark Delany
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Earl Hood
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Douglas Otis
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Barry Leiba
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Mark Delany
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Douglas Otis
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Earl Hood
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Douglas Otis
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Earl Hood
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIMand (eventual) IETF DKIM, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
  - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Michael Thomas
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Michael Thomas
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
- Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Andrew Newton
  - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Andrew Newton
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETFDKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Hector Santos
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Dave Crocker
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Andrew Newton
    - Re: over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM, Douglas Otis
RE: Re: signature construct, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Re: signature construct, william(at)elan.net
- RE: Re: signature construct, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: Re: signature construct, william(at)elan.net
- RE: Re: signature construct, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Re: dkim service, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Re: dkim service, John R Levine
- RE: Re: dkim service, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: dkim service, John Levine
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: dkim service, John R Levine
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: dkim service, John R Levine
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Dave Crocker
    - on multi-signatures (was Re: Re: dkim service, Amir Herzberg
    - Re: on multi-signatures (was Re: Re: dkim service, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: on multi-signatures (was Re: Re: dkim service, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: on multi-signatures (was Re: Re: dkim service, Eliot Lear
    - Re: on multi-signatures (was Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: what is DKIM for, was on multi-signatures, John Levine
    - what DKIM is for, Dave Crocker
    - RE: what DKIM is for, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    - Re: Re: what is DKIM for, was on multi-signatures, Michael Thomas
    - RE: Re: what is DKIM for, was on multi-signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Hector Santos
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Hector Santos
- RE: Re: dkim service, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Re: dkim service, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Structure of the threat analysis..., Stephen Farrell
- Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Jim Fenton
  - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Eliot Lear
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Jim Fenton
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Jim Fenton
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Structure of the threat analysis..., Russ Housley
Proposed Charter, revised., Douglas Otis
Proposed Charter, drop header authentication assertion., Douglas Otis
Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
- Re: Charter bashing..., Arvel Hathcock
  - Re: Charter bashing..., John Levine
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Jim Fenton
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Eliot Lear
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Arvel Hathcock
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Amir Herzberg
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Michael Thomas
- Re: Charter bashing..., Amir Herzberg
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Ned Freed
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Dave Crocker
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Michael Thomas
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Dave Crocker
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Douglas Otis
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Dave Crocker
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Douglas Otis
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Eliot Lear
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Ned Freed
    - dkim service (was: Re: Charter bashing...), Stephen Farrell
    - Re: dkim service, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Re: dkim service, John Levine
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Barry Leiba
    - Re: Re: dkim service, John Levine
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Ned Freed
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: dkim service, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: dkim service, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: dkim service, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - dkim service and mail lists, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: dkim service and mail lists, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: dkim service and mail lists, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service and mail lists, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Re: dkim service and mail lists, Michael Thomas
    - Re: Re: dkim service and mail lists, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Re: dkim service and mail lists, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: dkim service and mail lists, Earl Hood
    - Re: dkim service and mail lists, william(at)elan.net
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: dkim service, Jim Fenton
    - Re: dkim service, Amir Herzberg
    - Re: dkim service (was: Re: Charter bashing...), Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Dave Crocker
- Re: Charter bashing..., Hector Santos
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
- RE: Charter bashing..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
- RE: Charter bashing..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Dave Crocker
- RE: Charter bashing..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Earl Hood
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Jim Fenton
- RE: Charter bashing..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Charter bashing..., Amir Herzberg
- RE: Charter bashing..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Michael Thomas
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Michael Thomas
- RE: Charter bashing..., Bill.Oxley
  - Re: Charter bashing..., John Levine
- RE: Charter bashing..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Charter bashing..., Earl Hood
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Jim Fenton
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Earl Hood
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Jim Fenton
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Earl Hood
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Jim Fenton
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Douglas Otis
    - Re: Charter bashing..., Earl Hood
DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Barry Leiba
- Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Arvel Hathcock
  - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Ned Freed
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Earl Hood
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Ned Freed
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Earl Hood
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Michael Thomas
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Earl Hood
    - signature construct (was: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda), Stephen Farrell
    - Re: signature construct (was: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charterand agenda), Hector Santos
    - Re: signature construct, Amir Herzberg
    - Re: signature construct, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: signature construct, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Re: signature construct, John Levine
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Barry Leiba
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Ned Freed
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Douglas Otis
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Ned Freed
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Ned Freed
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Hector Santos
    - Re: signature construct, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Mark Delany
    - Re: Re: signature construct, Douglas Otis
    - Body hash is not an optimization, Mark Delany
    - Re: Body hash is not an optimization, Douglas Otis
    - Re: signature construct (was: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda), Earl Hood
    - Re: signature construct (was: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda), william(at)elan.net
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Arvel Hathcock
  - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Earl Hood
- Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Barry Leiba
  - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, John Levine
  - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Ned Freed
  - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Arvel Hathcock
  - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Barry Leiba
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Ned Freed
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Earl Hood
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Barry Leiba
- RE: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Barry Leiba
    - Re: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Dave Crocker
- RE: Re: DKIM BOF -- draft charter and agenda, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
DKIM BOF Chair Appointments, Russ Housley
- Re: DKIM BOF Chair Appointments, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: DKIM BOF Chair Appointments, Arvel Hathcock
missing bibliography regarding year long issue., Douglas Otis
RE: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Douglas Otis
  - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Jim Fenton
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Eliot Lear
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Dave Crocker
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Jim Fenton
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Dave Crocker
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Dave Crocker
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Dave Crocker
    - Reputation can not be established without ready means to abate of abusive replays [was: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00], Douglas Otis
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Jim Fenton
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Dave Crocker
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Jim Fenton
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Dave Crocker
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Earl Hood
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Earl Hood
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Hector Santos
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Michael Thomas
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Earl Hood
    - Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Earl Hood
- RE: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: draft-fenton-dkim-threats-00, Earl Hood
Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, John Levine
- Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Amir Herzberg
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, John Levine
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Dave Crocker
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Jim Fenton
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Amir Herzberg
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, John Levine
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Arvel Hathcock
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Jim Fenton
- RE: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Amir Herzberg
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, John Levine
- RE: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Earl Hood
- Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Earl Hood
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Ned Freed
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Earl Hood
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Ned Freed
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Earl Hood
  - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Jim Fenton
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Jim Fenton
    - Re: Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Douglas Otis
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Earl Hood
    - Re: New DKIM threat analysis draft, Earl Hood