ietf.dkim (date)

ietf.dkim (date)

August 31, 2005

RE: Revised threat model, Tim Moses
Re: Revised threat model, Arvel Hathcock

August 30, 2005

No centralized database is needed., Douglas Otis
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Frank Ellermann
RE: Re: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specificationand deployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specificationand deployment, Frank Ellermann
RE: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specificationand deployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specificationand deployment, Michael Thomas
RE: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specificationand deployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Revised threat model, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Revisiting the charter., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Re: Forgery complexities, Douglas Otis
Re: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specification and deployment, Jim Fenton
RE: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specification anddeployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: Forgery complexities, Scott Kitterman
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: Forgery complexities, Douglas Otis
Re: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specification and deployment, william(at)elan.net
Re: Purpose and sequencefor DKIM specification and deployment, Scott Kitterman
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Earl Hood

August 29, 2005

Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Earl Hood
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Earl Hood
Re: Re: Forgery complexities, Dave Crocker
Re: Forgery complexities, Earl Hood
RE: Purpose and sequence forDKIM specificationand deployment, william(at)elan.net
Re: Forgery complexities, Douglas Otis
RE: Purpose and sequence forDKIM specificationand deployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Scott Kitterman
RE: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Forgery complexities, Dave Crocker
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Douglas Otis
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationanddeployment, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification anddeployment, Arvel Hathcock
RE: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specificationand deployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification anddeployment, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Douglas Otis
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Dave Crocker
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Douglas Otis

August 28, 2005

Re: Re: accountability, resenders, and replay, Keith Moore
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Dave Crocker
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Douglas Otis

August 27, 2005

Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Scott Kitterman
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Dave Crocker
Re: Re: accountability, resenders, and replay, John Levine
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Scott Kitterman
Re: Apology, Frank Ellermann
Re: Thoughts on the DNS RR issue, Frank Ellermann
Re: Feedback in charter, Frank Ellermann
Re: Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Frank Ellermann
Purpose and sequence for DKIM specification and deployment, Dave Crocker

August 26, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Jim Fenton
Re: accountability, resenders, and replay, Keith Moore
Re: accountability, resenders, and replay, Jim Fenton
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Feedback in charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Thoughts on the DNS RR issue, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
accountability, resenders, and replay, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Florian Weimer

August 25, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Jim Fenton
Re: Inclusion of RCPT TO in signed content, Tony Finch
Inclusion of RCPT TO in signed content, Jim Fenton
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Douglas Otis
Apology, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John R Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis

August 24, 2005

RE: Is accountability singular?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Dave Crocker
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, SM
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Miles
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Is accountability binary?, Tony Hansen
Re: Is accountability singular?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Is accountability singular?, Jim Fenton
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
RE: Is accountability binary?, John R Levine
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Douglas Otis
RE: Is accountability binary?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Is accountability singular?, Michael Thomas
Re: Is accountability binary?, John Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
RE: Is accountability singular?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
RE: Is accountability binary?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Frank Ellermann
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Jim Fenton
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Scott Kitterman
Is accountability binary?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: proposed threat analysis outline, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John R Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Re: SSP and DKIM, was Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: Re: SSP and DKIM, was Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: updated threat analysis outline, Douglas Otis
RE: DKIM vs. S/MIME and OpenPGP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

August 23, 2005

Re: SSP and DKIM, was Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
RE: BCC Recipients, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
DKIM vs. S/MIME and OpenPGP, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Jim Fenton
Some real world DKIM feedback, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: BCC Recipients, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
RE: BCC Recipients, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Jim Fenton
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, william(at)elan.net
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: BCC Recipients, william(at)elan.net
Re: More of a marketting plan really, Tony Finch
updated threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
BCC Recipients, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
More of a marketting plan really, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
RE: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: what DKIM is --- a personal perspective, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP recorddoesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Russ Housley
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Ned Freed
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John R Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John R Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: proposed threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Frank Ellermann
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: proposed threat analysis outline, Jim Fenton
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: proposed threat analysis outline, Eric Allman

August 22, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
proposed threat analysis outline, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Tony Finch
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis

August 21, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis

August 20, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Scott Kitterman
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, SM
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, SM

August 19, 2005

Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Jim Fenton
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Jim Fenton
Re: semantics of message signing, Jim Fenton
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Jim Fenton
what DKIM is --- a personal perspective, Eric Allman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, John Levine
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis

August 18, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, SM
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Jim Fenton
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Jim Fenton
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Frank Ellermann
Re: assertions, was on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: assertions, was on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, John Levine
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Local-part and user-key risk, Douglas Otis

August 17, 2005

Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Jim Fenton
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, william(at)elan.net
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Dave Crocker
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: Authentication-Results: Header, Arvel Hathcock
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Jim Fenton
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, John R Levine
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Jim Fenton
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Michael Thomas
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Scott Kitterman
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
rogue DNS registrars, was Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, George Gross
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
[THREAT] poor deployment of secure email, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Hector Santos
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Focus on: Threat Analysis and Chartering, Dave Crocker
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Scott Kitterman
DKIM Threat Analysis & Charter, Hector Santos
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Tony Finch
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
semantics of message signing, Keith Moore
Re: Exactly not a threat analysis, John R Levine
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Michael Thomas
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Scott Kitterman
Re: Authentication-Results: Header, Tony Hansen
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: Authentication-Results: Header, Earl Hood
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Earl Hood
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, John R Levine
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Frank Ellermann
Authentication-Results: Header, Hector Santos
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Hector Santos
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, John Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis

August 16, 2005

Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Douglas Otis
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Earl Hood
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Keith Moore
on DKIM as an anti-spam measure, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Thomas Roessler
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Hector Santos
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John R Levine
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Michael Thomas
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Hector Santos
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Hector Santos
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", william(at)elan.net
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Scott Kitterman
Re: a bit of philosophy on working group productivity and scope, Keith Moore
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
linkage between "originator" and "handling agent", Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis

August 15, 2005

Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, SM
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
RE: Not exactly not a threat analysis, James Scott
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, George Gross
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, SM
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, SM
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
RE: dkim implementations, Ned Freed
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
RE: dkim implementations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, SM
dkim implementations, Dave Crocker
RE: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Scott Kitterman
RE: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Just stop complaining and produce a threat analysis. RE: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Hector Santos
RE: Not exactly not a threat analysis, James Scott
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Douglas Otis
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Eliot Lear
Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Dave Crocker
RE: a bit of philosophy on working groupproductivityandscope, James Scott

August 14, 2005

Re: Not exactly not a threat analysis, Jon Callas
Re: a bit of philosophy on working group productivityandscope, Arvel Hathcock
Re: a bit of philosophy on working group productivity andscope, Arvel Hathcock
Re: a bit of philosophy on working group productivityandscope, Arvel Hathcock
Re: a bit of philosophy on working group productivity andscope, Scott Kitterman
RE: a bit of philosophy on working group productivity andscope, Dave Crocker
RE: a bit of philosophy on working group productivity andscope, Scott Kitterman
a bit of philosophy on working group productivity and scope, Dave Crocker
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, SM
RE: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, SM
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, SM
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, SM
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, SM
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Earl Hood
Not exactly not a threat analysis, John Levine
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Arvel Hathcock
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Keith Moore
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore

August 13, 2005

Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Michael Thomas
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: on the suitability of the From header field, domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
on the suitability of the From header field, Keith Moore
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Earl Hood
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Jon Callas
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Dave Crocker
Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Ned Freed
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Ned Freed
Re: What's a replay?, Douglas Otis
Re: What's a replay?, Eric Allman

August 12, 2005

Re: on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Arvel Hathcock
on the scope and necessity of threat analysis, Keith Moore
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), SM
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Arvel Hathcock
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Hector Santos
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Arvel Hathcock
RE: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Andrew Newton
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Dave Crocker
Threat assement - alternative approach, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Why we will never solve the problem completely, John Glube
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Hector Santos
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Arvel Hathcock
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Jim Fenton
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Frank Ellermann
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), John Levine
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Andrew Newton
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Andrew Newton
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, william(at)elan.net
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Hector Santos

August 11, 2005

Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Hector Santos
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Hector Santos
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Ned Freed
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Michael Thomas
Re: replay, revocation, repudiation, was RE: On per-user-keying, Earl Hood
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Arvel Hathcock
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Why we will never solve the problem completely, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Re: Using PKIX certificates with dkim, Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Andrew Newton
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Arvel Hathcock
RE: replay, revocation, repudiation, was RE: [ietf-dkim] On per-user-keying, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Jon Callas
RE: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: What's a replay?, Douglas Otis
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Dave Crocker
replay, revocation, repudiation, was RE: [ietf-dkim] On per-user-keying, Tony Finch
RE: What's a replay?, Paul Maddox
Re: What's a replay?, Tony Finch
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
RE: MASS/DKIM BOF Summary, Tony Finch
RE: Re: Using PKIX certificates with dkim, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: What's a replay?, Paul Maddox
Re: Using PKIX certificates with dkim, Frank Ellermann
RE: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), John Levine
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, SM

August 10, 2005

Re: DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Douglas Otis
DKIM Threat Analysis v0.06, Dave Crocker
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Eric Allman
Using PKIX certificates with dkim, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP recorddoesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Dave Crocker
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record doesnot exist?, Arvel Hathcock
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Dave Crocker
RE: On per-user-keying, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: On per-user-keying, Douglas Otis
Re: How to solve replay with no specification changes, william(at)elan.net
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), John Levine
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: On per-user-keying), domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: On per-user-keying, John Levine
Re: DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, John Levine
Design approach to MASS (was Re: [ietf-dkim] On per-user-keying), Earl Hood
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Earl Hood
Re: What's a replay?, Douglas Otis
RE: On per-user-keying, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Eric Allman
DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?, Earl Hood
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Earl Hood
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas

August 09, 2005

Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), domainkeys-feedbackbase02
Re: What's a replay?, Eric Allman
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Earl Hood
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Hector Santos
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Eric Allman
RE: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Eric Allman
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Dave Crocker
Re: What's a replay?, Douglas Otis
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Earl Hood
RE: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Scott Kitterman
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
Re: What's a replay?, Dave Crocker
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Dave Crocker
How to solve replay with no specification changes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Michael Thomas
RE: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Dan Wing
Re: DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Earl Hood
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Douglas Otis
DKIM Threat Assessment v0.02 (very rough draft), Dave Crocker
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, John R Levine
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Amir Herzberg
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Amir Herzberg
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Douglas Otis
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, John R Levine
Re: What's a replay?, Douglas Otis

August 08, 2005

What's a replay?, Jon Callas
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Amir Herzberg
Re: DKIM implementations SHOULD support replay protection (was: Re: Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Dave Crocker
Re: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Douglas Otis
RE: Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: MASS/DKIM BOF Summary, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Replay isn't the problem, spam is the problem, John R Levine
Re: MASS/DKIM BOF Summary, Dave Crocker
DKIM implementations SHOULD support replay protection (was: Re: Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Amir Herzberg
Re: Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, John R Levine
Re: Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Amir Herzberg
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Amir Herzberg
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, John R Levine
Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Douglas Otis

August 07, 2005

Re: Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, John R Levine
Re: Replay attacks and ISP business models, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: Replay attacks, what's that?, Douglas Otis
Re: Re: Replay attacks, what's that?, Tony Finch
Re: DoS and Replay protection for message signatures, Earl Hood
Re: DoS and Replay protection for message signatures, Douglas Otis
Re: Replay attacks, what's that?, Douglas Otis

August 06, 2005

On per-user-keying, Jon Callas

August 05, 2005

Re: One space proposal, Tony Hansen
re: ] Replay attacks and ISP business models, Douglas Otis
Re: ] Replay attacks and ISP business models, Douglas Otis

News | FAQ | advertise