|
Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: msg#00025ietf.apps-discuss
--On Wednesday, 24 January, 2007 16:31 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:14:21AM -0500, > John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote > a message of 52 lines which said: > >> I don't see how to get agreement on a single form: almost >> everyone who doesn't like \u / \U likes something >> different... there is no evidence in the notes I have >> received that indicates one uniform strong preference in the >> community as to what the syntax should be. > > But there is (may be) a rough consensus that every scheme with > explicit delimiters (&#xNNNN; or \u{NNNNN}) is better than any > scheme without them? If so, it would be a progress. Much as I would personally prefer that answer, I haven't seen such a consensus emerge yet. john |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: 00025, John C Klensin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: 00025, John C Klensin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txti: 00025, Stephane Bortzmeyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: 00025, Clive D.W. Feather |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |