logo       

Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: msg#00025

ietf.apps-discuss

Subject: Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt



--On Wednesday, 24 January, 2007 16:31 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer
<bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:14:21AM -0500,
> John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote
> a message of 52 lines which said:
>
>> I don't see how to get agreement on a single form: almost
>> everyone who doesn't like \u / \U likes something
>> different... there is no evidence in the notes I have
>> received that indicates one uniform strong preference in the
>> community as to what the syntax should be.
>
> But there is (may be) a rough consensus that every scheme with
> explicit delimiters (&#xNNNN; or \u{NNNNN}) is better than any
> scheme without them? If so, it would be a progress.

Much as I would personally prefer that answer, I haven't seen
such a consensus emerge yet.

john







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise