logo       

Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: msg#00022

ietf.apps-discuss

Subject: Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:14:21AM -0500,
John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 52 lines which said:

> I don't see how to get agreement on a single form: almost everyone
> who doesn't like \u / \U likes something different... there is no
> evidence in the notes I have received that indicates one uniform
> strong preference in the community as to what the syntax should be.

But there is (may be) a rough consensus that every scheme with
explicit delimiters (&#xNNNN; or \u{NNNNN}) is better than any scheme
without them? If so, it would be a progress.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise