|
Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: msg#00022ietf.apps-discuss
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:14:21AM -0500, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote a message of 52 lines which said: > I don't see how to get agreement on a single form: almost everyone > who doesn't like \u / \U likes something different... there is no > evidence in the notes I have received that indicates one uniform > strong preference in the community as to what the syntax should be. But there is (may be) a rough consensus that every scheme with explicit delimiters (&#xNNNN; or \u{NNNNN}) is better than any scheme without them? If so, it would be a progress. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: 00022, John C Klensin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: 00022, der Mouse |
| Previous by Thread: | Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txti: 00022, John C Klensin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Next step (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-00.txt: 00022, John C Klensin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |