|
| <prev next> |
Re: RequiresBundle, ImportPackage and virtual providers: msg#00101ide.eclipse.equinox.devel
On Friday 31 March 2006 16:17, Peter Kriens wrote: > In my opinion, the javax.xml.parsers example is better done with > Import-Package (javax.xml.parsers package has a clear spec version) because > it leaves the deployer more freedom and requires less work. If you have a > better example (where you accept that a a package is an atom), we can > analyze it. Bingo. Everyone forgotten the DOM1 -> DOM2 transition, and the more recent struggle for DOM2 -> DOM3 transition?? In Osgi, it would have been a breeze of co-existence!! Cheers Niclas |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re[2]: RequiresBundle, ImportPackage and virtual providers: 00101, Thomas Watson |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: RequiresBundle, ImportPackage and virtual providersi: 00101, Thomas Watson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |