|
RE: RE: Another post from the same guy about 400 support.: msg#00680hardware.microcontrollers.tini
Hit send too soon on the previous emai. To finish up, the app notes are online at http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes10.cfm/ac_pk/37/ln/en and http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes10.cfm/ac_pk/17/ln/en. > -----Original Message----- > From: Clayton Ware > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:21 PM > To: 'Mark Purcell [MAP]' > Cc: TINI Interest Group > Subject: RE: [TINI] RE: Another post from the same guy about 400 > support. > > > Mark, > I shipped out a handful of very early prototypes in February. > The part was not shipped as a production component until the > end of March > (http://maillist.dalsemi.com/maillists/tini/2003-March/024995. > html). I was mistaken earlier when I said April. > > We do have significant resources dedicated to the TINI as can > be seen from the number of posts from Dallas Semiconductor engineers. > > The serial driver will be made available in a pre-release as > soon as possible. I have an engineer who will begin work > next week. We had hoped he would be able to start sooner but > has been delayed with design of another product. > > It is still possible to use serial port 1 and mux with the > 1-Wire as a short term solution. It would require jumpering > the serial 1 tx/rx lines to the RS232 level shifter on serial four. > > You mentioned lack of formal documentation in your previous > email. We have many documents on our web site which detail > the DSTINIm400 and DSTINIs400. The datasheets for both are > online at http://www.maxim-ic.com/DSTINIM400 and > http://www.maxim-ic.com/DSTINIS400. Many application notes > have been published over the last several months including > app notes 712, 711, 710, 615, 614, 613, 612, 708, 703, 704, > 609, 707, 709, and 706. These are all documents which relate > to the DS80C400 or DSTINIm400. In addition, we are heavily > advertising worldwide and have published an Engineering > Review dedicated to Networked Microcontrollers. They should > be in the mail now for people who might be interested. > The app notes can be found at > > Clayton > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Purcell [MAP] > > [mailto:map-hdgEqy5R1AG+FmPSFd0fl9Bc4/FLrbF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:58 AM > > To: Clayton Ware > > Cc: TINI Interest Group > > Subject: Re: [TINI] RE: Another post from the same guy about 400 > > support. > > > > > > Hi Clayton, > > > > I really think you should look at this from the developer's > > perspective. You > > sold a TINIs400 development board with two serial ports, > > similar to the Exx > > series, but the second serial port on the TINIs400 does not > > require the one > > wire network to be disabled. It is quite reasonable for > > customers to think > > this serial port will be supported in a timely fashion, and > > that in fact it > > is a relatively simple job for you to add it (given the > serial drivers > > already exist for the other ports). Contrary to your > > assertion that you only > > started shipping these boards in April, here is a post from > > February that > > indicates both these boards were in use back then: > > http://lists.dalsemi.com/maillists/tini/2003-February/023977.h > > tml. This > > particular problem has been outstanding for the best part of > > 5 months, and > > now you're saying it'll be 'in August' before its supported. > > > > Well, I am a developer and my reaction to this is that you > > don't have the > > resources allocated to support the TINIx400 properly, and > > that is almost as > > bad as saying it's dead. This on top of the fact that at > > least two customers > > have very real development problems due to the lack of > > support for this > > port. Even Bruce at Systronix seems to be biting his tongue > > when responding > > on this issue. > > > > Like it or not this port problem will be used as a barometer > > by developers > > to indicate your *real* level of support. They'll ask > > themselves "What if I > > have a problem with something I could have expected to work? > > How long will > > Dallas take to fix it, and how much time will I lose in my project > > development as a result?". > > > > You could go a long way to putting this right by adding this > > support in a > > pre-release as soon as possible, if of course you really do > > have the support > > resources allocated to do such things. > > > > Mark. > > > > Mark Purcell, MAP Electronics > > web: http://www.mapelectronics.co.uk/ > > email: map-hdgEqy5R1AG+FmPSFd0fl9Bc4/FLrbF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Clayton Ware" <Clayton.Ware-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <map-hdgEqy5R1AG+FmPSFd0fl9Bc4/FLrbF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: <noda-G/gkmOS9IO7e+W599mIaPQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <tini@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:57 PM > > Subject: [TINI] RE: Another post from the same guy about > 400 support. > > > > > > > Mark, > > > Dallas is 100% behind the TINIm400 and TINIs400. We only > > started shipping > > > the evaluation boards in April. The serial driver is > > scheduled to be > > > released as part of the TINI1.12 update in August. If we > > have it sooner, > > > then we will make a pre-release available to the list. > > > > > > There is plenty of room for both the Systronix 72 pin > module and the > > > DSTINIm400. I have worked closely with Bruce (Systronix) > > on his design. > > We > > > wanted to make sure that all existing DS80C390 TINI sockets > > had an upgrade > > > path to the DS80C400 if desired. The purpose of the new > > TINIm400 module > > is > > > to expose as much functionality of the DS80C400 as possible > > to developers. > > > We are providing this module as the standard evaluation > kit for the > > DS80C400 > > > for both C and Java development. We are also going to sell > > in volume if > > > customers desire. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Clayton > > > > > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > > Subject: Re: [TINI] please help > > > > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:39:38 +0100 > > > > From: Mark Purcell [MAP] > > > > <map-hdgEqy5R1AG+FmPSFd0fl9Bc4/FLrbF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reply-To: Mark Purcell [MAP] > > > > <map-hdgEqy5R1AG+FmPSFd0fl9Bc4/FLrbF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Organization: MAP Electronics > > > > To: Claro A Noda <noda-G/gkmOS9IO7e+W599mIaPQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > > > <tini@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > References: > > > > <1899.192.168.32.25.1056501627.squirrel-NgPGqctCJv1+14uXscYCi3AS51h682N1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Hi Claro, > > > > > > > > I would be very wary indeed about using the > > > > TINIm400/TINIs400. The reason is > > > > the lack of formal documentation, and the level of support > > > > really seems to > > > > be lacking. The second serial port on the TINIs400 board for > > > > example (AKA > > > > serial4) have no drivers written for it - this basic problem > > > > was highlighted > > > > as long ago as February but this has still not been added > > > > despite several > > > > customers complaining and one at least getting very irate, > > > > justifiably so > > > > IMO. > > > > > > > > As an aside, Systronix were in development of a bussed > > > > version of their > > > > TStik.72.nb at one point and Bruce is on record as saying > > > > that they have > > > > quite a close relationship with Dallas. If this goes ahead > > > > there'll be two > > > > competing 400 systems albeit on different form factors, but > > > > Systronix will > > > > have the significant advantage of backwards compatibility > > > > (hardware and > > > > software) with the existing 390 Simm72 development systems > > > > and boards. Room > > > > in the bed for two?? > > > > > > > > Until I hear otherwise from Dallas in this list I assume, > > > > from all I've seen > > > > so far, that the TINIm400/TINIs400 is either dead or dying, > > > > and I would seek > > > > formal confirmation from them that this is not so before > > purchasing. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Mark. > > > > > > > > Mark Purcell, MAP Electronics > > > > web: http://www.mapelectronics.co.uk/ > > > > email: map-hdgEqy5R1AG+FmPSFd0fl9Bc4/FLrbF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Claro A Noda" <noda-G/gkmOS9IO7e+W599mIaPQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: <tini-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:40 AM > > > > Subject: [TINI] please help > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > Greetings from Havana. > > > > I just joined the list in a rush. > > > > > > > > We are making last minute decisions regarding purchase of a > > > > Tini system, > > > > mostly for evaluation purposes. Due to quite a few constrains > > > > the parts > > > > will probably ship to Norway... > > > > > > > > We will deeply appreciate down to earth comments from those > > > > with experience > > > > on the purchasing/shipping arena that can enlighten us. > > > > > > > > We need to know how long would it take this parts, once > > > > bought online, to > > > > reach Oslo. > > > > > > > > In this page, at the ibutton store: > > > > https://store.ibutton.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/CategoryDisplay? > > > > cgrfnbr=804&cgmenbr=776&cg=804 > > > > > > > > it says that they have a lead time of 8-12 weeks, > > > > > > > > on the other hand, > > > > > > > > I've found the new version of the Tini Board and its upgraded > > > > socket at the > > > > Maxim/Dallas's Ecommerce site. Identified as DSTINIM400 & > > DSTINIS400 > > > > respectively. Surprisingly in stock. > > > > > > > > Hints will be well appreciated too. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > Claro. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Claro Noda > > > > IMRE-Physics Faculty. > > > > University of Havana. > > > > Cuba. > > > > > > > > p +537 878 8950 x 445 > > > > f +1 320 216 9711 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > TINI mailing list > > > > TINI-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, edit your profile, or see list archives: > > > > http://lists.dalsemi.com/mailman/listinfo/tini > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > TINI mailing list > > > > TINI-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, edit your profile, or see list archives: > > > > http://lists.dalsemi.com/mailman/listinfo/tini > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > > > Bryan Armstrong > > > > bryan.armstrong-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > TINI mailing list > > > TINI-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, edit your profile, or see list archives: > > > http://lists.dalsemi.com/mailman/listinfo/tini > > > > > > _______________________________________________ TINI mailing list TINI-6tN4nzCoH/hBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UNSUBSCRIBE, edit your profile, or see list archives: http://lists.dalsemi.com/mailman/listinfo/tini |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: how secure is a .tini file ?: 00680, Kris Ardis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RF in TINI Board: 00680, suresh1 |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RE: Another post from the same guy about 400 support.i: 00680, Clayton Ware |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: Another post from the same guy about 400 support.: 00680, Mark Purcell [MAP] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |