|
Re: An Idea for new Mindstorms - event potential?: msg#00084hardware.lego.robotics
> Overall, a common housefly probably has more available compute power than > a modern desktop PC. I'm not knocking the fly, I'm saying that landing on the ceiling is a very difficult problem to solve by realtime calculated piloting (even using a desktop PC). But it needs very little calculation at all if the problem is almost entirely offloaded into the body design. The research I saw indicated that the computational power the fly was applying to _this_particular_ task was very low. The reason is that the task is better solved by body than by brains, so the brain is barely involved. And the importance of this is easy to underplay when building robotic. I imagine the vast bulk of a fly's neurons would be related to processing sight, yet from what I recall, you can blind a fly, effectively removing all those neurons from the system, and it will still land on the ceiling without difficulty. (While a desktop PC realtime piloting solution would be greatly dependant on the instrumentation, if it even worked at all). I'm saying "This stuff is really cool!", rather than "Flies are lame and only saved by this other thing being well done" :-) |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorms - event potential?: 00084, jp4space |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does any RCX firmware allow a variable to survice shutdown?: 00084, John Hansen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorms - event potential?i: 00084, jp4space |
| Next by Thread: | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorm: 00084, Alexander Horoshilov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |