|
Re: An Idea for new Mindstorm: msg#00077hardware.lego.robotics
> Isn't it a bit of a contradiction to have a person who wants to build robots, > but doesn't want to program? A true robot, of the kind we see on this > newsgroup, > is a harmonious blend of decent programming and decent construction. If you > take > the programming element out, all you're doing is building another Technic > model, > albeit slightly more complex. I don't see a market for this kind of thing in > my > area at all: everyone I know either is an excellent roboticist, or hasn't the > slightest interest in robotics. Just my few, random thoughts on the matter. > > Andrew Meyer Yes, exactly - some models have to be just small step behind Technic. It will allow people to easy shift from "just Technic" to robotics. Currently, there are too large gap between Technic and Mindstorm, I think. If filled, it will allow easier learning. And when one got enough of experience, he can purchase "PC connector kit" and start developing its own programs. So we can expect that more "excellent roboticists" will grow because of easier self-education. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorm: 00077, Alexander Horoshilov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Does any RCX firmware allow a variable to survice shutdown?: 00077, Justin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: An Idea for new Mindstormi: 00077, Alexander Horoshilov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: An Idea for new Mindstorms - event potential?: 00077, Justin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |