logo       
Bookmark and Share

BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good: msg#00002

hardware.lego.robotics

Subject: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good

At 07:47 PM 5/31/2005, Steve Baker wrote:
Bluetooth is a very versatile RF-communication that could allow real flexible
networking for multi-agent applications. This would be a much faster
communication than slow IR.

Bluetooth has a maximum range of 30 feet. That's in optimum conditions.
You might get down as low as 15 feet in real world applications. At 2GHz
or so, it doesn't go through walls very well either.

Bluetooth is actually very poor for embedded or robotic applications. It's a power hog, development tools are expensive (try $5000 minimum), true peer to peer modules are almost impossible to get unless you are a Fortune 500 company, and the time required for a BT node to wake up, authenticate, and transmit data is very long. BT is also overly complex for most embedded or robotic applications. The range of 30 feet is not great either.

So what is OK?

Zigbee is much newer and is designed for use with embedded and robotic applications. The time required for a Zigbee node to wake up, authenticate, and transmit data is very short - less than 1/10 that of BT. Power consumption is much less, and range can be 100 feet or more, depending on antenna design and other factors. Tools are very affordable (sometimes free) and dev kits are $300 or less.

There is a Zigbee alliance with a lot of major companies such as Motorola, Samsung, Philips, etc:
http://www.zigbee.org/en/about/members.asp

Also get this white paper: "ZigBee and Bluetooth: Competitive or Complementary?" at
http://www.zigbee.org/en/resources/#WhitePapers

We are designing a Zigbee node for use with JCX, (which will finally start shipping this June/July after almost 4 years of development and testing). We are planning on using the Freescale Zigbee chip MC13192. We have a couple of their dev kits which were about $300.
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MC13192&nodeId=01752003088166

Properly designed Zigbee nodes can interoperate. What about BT? Vendors are deliberately designing some BT products (such as cell phone headsets in particular) so they don't interoperate for "competitive reasons". Pretty dumb, huh?

The "BlueTooth" serial adapters which are available, and which most people point to as BT for embedded use are a very hacked-down subset of BT and are not generally useful. They support only two devices per network, with only serial conversion. They are only useful for short range serial comm between two devices, nothing more.

You can get started with Zigbee nodes from Mouser:
http://www.mouser.com/dlpdesign/

So to sum up, forget BT for robotics. Use Zigbee.

Regards

Bruce


------- WWW.SYSTRONIX.COM ----------
Real embedded Java and much more
www.jrealtime.com and www.tstik.com
+1-801-534-1017 Salt Lake City, USA




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise