|
Re: G.SHDSL - Cicso 878 - OSPF Problemi: msg#00023hardware.cisco.turkish
Merhaba Ýlker Bey, Cisco 878 (ATM) ve karþýsýndaki Interface altýna " ip ospf mtuâ??ignore" komutu girdik ve sorun çözüldü. Çok teþekkür ederim. iyi çalýþmalar Ali Tursun --- In cisco-ttl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ilker Temir <ilker@...> wrote: > > MTU sorunu gibi gorunuyor ama gerekli ciktilarin tamamini > gondermemissiniz. Her iki routerdan da > > show int > show ip ospf int > show ip ospf nei > debug ip ospf adj > konfigurasyonun ilgili kismi > > gondermeniz yararli olur. > > Ilker > > Ali Tursun wrote: > > Merhaba Ýlker Bey, > > > > Cisco 878'deki config aþaðýdaki gibidir. > > > > controller DSL 0 > > mode atm > > line-term cpe > > line-mode 2-wire line-zero > > dsl-mode shdsl symmetric annex B > > line-rate auto > > > > interface Loopback0 > > ip address 192.168.10.78 255.255.255.255 > > > > interface ATM0 > > description ********GSHDSL****** > > no ip address > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > ! > > interface ATM0.1 point-to-point > > ip address 172.16.26.2 255.255.255.252 > > ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 RdRIefJgmjqgaHyY > > ip ospf cost 390 > > pvc 0 0/35 > > vbr-nrt 256 256 > > encapsulation aal5snap > > > > interface Vlan1 > > description ******LAN ****** > > ip address 10.35.112.254 255.255.248.0 > > ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 > > ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 RdRIefJgmjqgaHyY > > ip ospf cost 1 > > ! > > router ospf 1 > > log-adjacency-changes > > area 1 authentication message-digest > > area 1 stub no-summary > > network 10.35.112.0 0.0.7.255 area 1 > > network 172.16.26.0 0.0.0.3 area 1 > > network 192.168.10.78 0.0.0.0 area 1 > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.26.1 > > > > ****************************************** > > > > OSPF Log çýktýsý > > > > ****************************************** > > > > OSPF adjacency events debugging is on > > Cinarli_Ofis# > > *Mar 31 05:52:36.463: OSPF: Send DBD to 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1672 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 > > *Mar 31 05:52:36.463: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:36.463: OSPF: Retransmitting DBD to 192.168.10.11 on > > ATM0.1 [6] > > *Mar 31 05:52:38.975: OSPF: Rcv DBD from 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1229 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 1500 state EXSTART > > *Mar 31 05:52:38.975: OSPF: First DBD and we are not SLAVE > > *Mar 31 05:52:39.095: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:41.463: OSPF: Send DBD to 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1672 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 > > *Mar 31 05:52:41.463: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:41.463: OSPF: Retransmitting DBD to 192.168.10.11 on > > ATM0.1 [7] > > *Mar 31 05:52:43.875: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:43.983: OSPF: Rcv DBD from 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1229 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 1500 state EXSTART > > *Mar 31 05:52:43.983: OSPF: First DBD and we are not SLAVE > > *Mar 31 05:52:46.463: OSPF: Send DBD to 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1672 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 > > *Mar 31 05:52:46.463: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:46.463: OSPF: Retransmitting DBD to 192.168.10.11 on > > ATM0.1 [8] > > *Mar 31 05:52:48.991: OSPF: Rcv DBD from 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1229 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 1500 state EXSTART > > *Mar 31 05:52:48.991: OSPF: First DBD and we are not SLAVE > > *Mar 31 05:52:49.095: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:51.463: OSPF: Send DBD to 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1672 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 > > *Mar 31 05:52:51.463: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:51.463: OSPF: Retransmitting DBD to 192.168.10.11 on > > ATM0.1 [9] > > *Mar 31 05:52:53.875: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:53.991: OSPF: Rcv DBD from 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1229 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 1500 state EXSTART > > *Mar 31 05:52:53.991: OSPF: First DBD and we are not SLAVE > > *Mar 31 05:52:56.463: OSPF: Send DBD to 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1672 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 > > *Mar 31 05:52:56.463: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:52:56.463: OSPF: Retransmitting DBD to 192.168.10.11 on > > ATM0.1 [10] > > *Mar 31 05:52:58.991: OSPF: Rcv DBD from 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1229 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 1500 state EXSTART > > *Mar 31 05:52:58.995: OSPF: First DBD and we are not SLAVE > > *Mar 31 05:52:59.095: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:53:01.463: OSPF: Send DBD to 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1672 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 > > *Mar 31 05:53:01.463: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:53:01.463: OSPF: Retransmitting DBD to 192.168.10.11 on > > ATM0.1 [11] > > *Mar 31 05:53:03.875: OSPF: Send with youngest Key 1 > > *Mar 31 05:53:03.995: OSPF: Rcv DBD from 192.168.10.11 on ATM0.1 seq > > 0x1229 opt 0x50 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu > > > > > > > > > > --- In cisco-ttl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ilker Temir ilker@ wrote: > > > >>Telekomla bir ilgisi olamaz, ayar hatasi olmali. OSPF, EIGRP'ye gore > >>ayarlar konusunda daha hassastir, MTU uyumu gerekir, interface'lere > > > > gore > > > >>durum degisik olabilir vb. > >> > >>"debug ip ospf adj" buyuk ihtimalle hatanin nerede oldugunu dogrudan > >>soyleyecektir. Eger boyle cozulmez ise asagidaki ciktilari OSPF'i > >>konfigure ettikten sonra gonderin. > >> > >>show ip ospf nei > >>show ip ospf int > >>debug ip ospf adj > >> > >>bir de iki router'daki ospf konfigurasyonlari yararli olur. > >> > >>Ilker > >> > >>Ali Tursun wrote: > >> > >>>Merhaba Arkadaþlar, > >>> > >>>2 durum var. > >>>2 lokasyon arasýnda G.SHDSL hat üzerinde Cisco 878'ler ile > > > > OSPF > > > >>>çalýþtýrmak > >>>1 taraf G.SHDSL (878)diðer taraf ise ATM (Cisco 7206'da).Yani > >>>G.SHDSL'i ATM'de sonlandýrýyorum. > >>> > >>>Bu 2 örnek'dede EIGRP çalýþýyor hiç sorun yok.Ama OSPF > > > > çalýþmýyor. > > > >>>Bu arada cisco 878'leri back-to-back baðlayýnca OSPF > > > > çalýþýyor( Bir > > > >>>taraf CPE diper taraf CO) > >>> > >>>Bu konuda tecrübesi olan varmýdýr ?.SOrun OSPF config'inde > > > > bir > > > >>>trik''mi yoksa Telekom'da özel bir trik'mi ? > >>> > >>>iyi çalýþmalar dilerim > >>> > >>>Ali Tursun > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Cisco Teknik Tartisma Listesi (Cisco-ttl) > >>> > >>>Bu listede onerilen degisikliklerin uygulanmasindaki tum sorumluluk > >>>kullaniciya aittir. Liste yoneticileri, oneride bulunan liste > > > > uyeleri ya da > > > >>>bu uyelerin calistigi kuruluslar herhangi bir sekilde sorumlu > > > > tutulamazlar. > > > >>>Yahoo! Groups Links > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cisco Teknik Tartisma Listesi (Cisco-ttl) > > > > Bu listede onerilen degisikliklerin uygulanmasindaki tum sorumluluk > > kullaniciya aittir. Liste yoneticileri, oneride bulunan liste uyeleri ya da > > bu uyelerin calistigi kuruluslar herhangi bir sekilde sorumlu tutulamazlar. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Cisco Teknik Tartisma Listesi (Cisco-ttl) Bu listede onerilen degisikliklerin uygulanmasindaki tum sorumluluk kullaniciya aittir. Liste yoneticileri, oneride bulunan liste uyeleri ya da bu uyelerin calistigi kuruluslar herhangi bir sekilde sorumlu tutulamazlar. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: cisco-ttl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: G.SHDSL - Cicso 878 - OSPF Problemi: 00023, Ilker Temir |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Dhcp on multiple vlans: 00023, Ulas Aydin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: G.SHDSL - Cicso 878 - OSPF Problemii: 00023, Ilker Temir |
| Next by Thread: | multicast: 00023, Mecit Yondem [ Dekare Destek Danışmanlık ] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |