|
Re: first attempt on transition to 2.6.15: msg#00043handhelds.linux.kernel
On 12/30/05, Erik Hovland <erik-OiAoASYA0cBAfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since I put it out there that we need to upgrade the kernel, I might as > well make a patch that attempts to do that. > > This patch: > http://hovland.org/familiar/kernel-2.6.13-hh1-to-2.6.15-hh0.patch.bz2 > > does just that. It compiles for h5400. I do not yet know if it boots for > that platform. I am keenly interested in feedback from h2200 and hx4700 > porters as I have not tackled those platforms and they will definitely > need fixing. > > Porting notes: > The header include/linux/device.h no longer includes > 'struct platform_device'. Drivers that require this struct will need to > include include/linux/platform_device.h instead. > > The power management system changed. So the suspend() and resume() > function signatures did too. Examples on how to deal with this change > are in the patch, look for SAMCOP drivers. > > Thanks, look forward to feedback. Have a good New Year! > > E > > -- > Erik Hovland > mail: erik AT hovland DOT org > web: http://hovland.org/ > PGP/GPG public key available on request > _______________________________________________ > Kernel-discuss mailing list > Kernel-discuss-CN5wO63fgwogsBAKwltoeQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-discuss > Is this mail about the suspend/resume changes you mentioned? http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/10/6/226 I tried to start a conversion of the hx4700 specific files, like this. But it doesn't compile because of an ssp.c/ssp.h mismatch: | arch/arm/mach-pxa/ssp.c: In function `ssp_interrupt': | arch/arm/mach-pxa/ssp.c:69: error: structure has no member named `ops' cheers Philipp
Kernel-discuss mailing list Kernel-discuss-CN5wO63fgwogsBAKwltoeQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-discuss |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: first attempt on transition to 2.6.15: 00043, Erik Hovland |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: first attempt on transition to 2.6.15: 00043, Giorgio Padrin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: first attempt on transition to 2.6.15i: 00043, Erik Hovland |
| Next by Thread: | Re: first attempt on transition to 2.6.15: 00043, Erik Hovland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |