Re: state of the 2.6.13 transition

On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Ian Molton wrote:
> Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 09:36 -0700, Erik Hovland wrote:
> >>On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 04:52:17PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> >>>Hi!
> >>>
> >>>What is the state of the handhelds.org kernel transition to 2.6.13?
> >>
> >>It seems that Ian's work to upgrade got a little horked up. I vote to
> >>revert HEAD to K2-6-12-hh3 ASAP.
> >
> > Agreed, that sounds like a good idea.  Although checking out from the
> > tag is fine for people who just want a working kernel, having the HEAD
> > broken makes it very difficult for anybody else to commit any patches.
>
> I've patched a lot of stuff but havent comitted it because I cant test
> it. it seems that HEAD is "missing" some files needed to build and I
> dont understand why.
>
> If anyone could explain it, I'd love to know the reason...
>
> In fact, I've patched all the conflicts except those in mtd and jffs.

Which files are "missing"?

Matt