Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote:
> > Felix Zielcke escribiÃ:
> > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed.
> > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully
> > > comes before December)
> > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December.
> 
> I don't see anything wrong with being "under development".  I hope that
> GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97.  I don't see how
> Debian can have any problem with that.

It depends.  If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say anything
about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready.

I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to the
truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth.  I think we
should make the website give a clear message that:

  a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it

  b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel