Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:18:58PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote:
> > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December.
> > 
> > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development".  I hope that
> > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97.

It's a bit like all those websites that say "under construction" - it's
just noise.

> Well to me it just sounds that isn't at all usable for an average user
> and not that it's actively developed.
> IIRC Colin Watson from the debian-installer team even told me this when
> I asked first about changing the grub2 instead of grub-legacy template
> in grub-installer. That says still that grub2 is experimental software.

I don't remember the exact conversation we had at the time, but I think
that template can be changed once Debian changes its default.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx]


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel