Re: Grub-devel Digest, Vol 65, Issue 108

> Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote:
>> > Felix Zielcke escribiÄÅ:
>> > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed.
>> > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully
>> > > comes before December)
>> > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December.
>>
>> I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". ÂI hope that
>> GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. ÂI don't see how
>> Debian can have any problem with that.
>>
>
> Well to me it just sounds that isn't at all usable for an average user
> and not that it's actively developed.
> IIRC Colin Watson from the debian-installer team even told me this when
> I asked first about changing the grub2 instead of grub-legacy template
> in grub-installer. That says still that grub2 is experimental software.
> But okay if we want to keep it and d-i team refuses to change that just
> because of that part in the grub2 website, then I just accept that.
>

We should say that version 1.97 is stable and version 1.98 is in development.

Why GRUB two is in version one dot ninety seven not version two dot ... ?


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel