|
Re: How to partition for Win98?: msg#00068gnu.parted.bugs
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:05:54AM +0200, Heinz Kirchmann wrote: > Sorry, but I couldn't find a solution for my problem how to partition a > harddisk properly for use in Windows98 and Linux. I tried hard to solve > this problem by myself but I'm running out of ideas now. Maybe you can > help me, although this is _very_ probable not a bug of parted (I > interpreted the sentence 'All discussion related to Parted is welcome' > that my problem is welcome, too :-) Of course :) > The history: In earlier days I used to partition my harddisks using > cfdisk. Doing it that way seemed to be a good idea until I once tried to > format one of my partitions from Windows98. This caused damage on > several partitions, even the ones with ext2, so I lost one of my Linux > systems that way. Now someone told me, that I had to be careful when > using big disks (> 8.5G): in that case one had to use the extended > versions for extended partition and windows partitions, he said. That's not very nice :/ > I checked that and found indeed the harddisk (of about 40G) wrongly > partitioned with partition type 5 for extended and 6 for the windows > partitions (fat16). Now I recently had a disk crash and now have the > opportunity to repartition the disk and correct this mistake. You can change partition types. (Well, "flags") (parted) set MINOR lba on > Since I was a little bit disappointed of cfdisk (where the type of the > extended partition seems to be automatically chosen as of type 5), I > decided to try parted instead. This worked well in that the extended > partition is now of type f and windows partitions (all logical) are of > type c (I decided to use fat32 now instead of fat16). BUT: when I boot > into my Windows98 system it is showing one more drive than I have > windows partitions. Very strange. Even stranger: why isn't parted detecting file systems on those partitions? (hda7 & friends) > This does not increase my confidence into invulnerability for my Linux > partitions when working with Windows98. First of all I thought the disk > might be too big for Windows 98 at all, but when I tried with another > smaller disk (9G) I found the same effects take place (indeed I found > _two_ more drives than partitions in that case). I tried hard to google > for more information, but I couldn't find anything relevant up to now. > So I decided to write this mail hoping you might give me a hint how to > avoid that problem. I'm really desperate, so any advice is welcome (or > maybe a hint where I can find more information). Perhaps windows doesn't like non-windows partitions coming before it in the extended partition. (Where "coming before" means "numbering-wise", not geometry-wise?) That would explain "the extra 2" Why do you have so many partitions?! Cheers, Andrew > Disk geometry for /dev/sda: 0.000-8715.820 megabytes > 1 0.031 1427.651 primary fat16 boot > 2 1427.651 1670.822 primary ext2 > 3 1670.823 1913.994 primary > 4 1913.994 7883.459 extended > 5 1914.025 2157.165 logical linux-swap > 6 2157.196 4063.315 logical fat16 > 7 4063.346 5020.312 logical > 8 5020.343 7883.459 logical ext2 > > Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0.000-39266.718 megabytes > 1 0.031 400.056 primary ext2 > 2 400.056 800.112 primary ext2 > 3 800.112 4800.673 primary ext2 > 4 4800.674 39260.412 extended lba > 5 4800.705 7302.985 logical ext2 > 6 7303.017 7797.172 logical ext2 > 7 7797.204 9797.453 logical lba > 8 9797.484 11797.734 logical lba > 9 11797.765 13798.015 logical lba > 10 13798.046 15798.295 logical lba > 11 15798.327 16300.327 logical > 12 16300.358 19296.826 logical > > Disk geometry for /dev/hdc: 0.000-43979.414 megabytes > 1 0.031 243.171 primary ext2 boot > 2 243.171 1388.430 primary > 3 1388.430 2149.321 primary ext2 > 4 2149.321 41456.799 extended > 5 2149.352 5012.468 logical ext2 > 6 5012.499 5773.359 logical ext2 > 7 5773.390 6016.530 logical ext2 > 8 6016.562 6259.702 logical ext2 > 9 6259.733 8165.852 logical fat16 > 10 8165.883 9122.849 logical ext2 > 11 9122.880 11028.999 logical ext2 > 12 11029.030 13892.146 logical ext2 > 13 13892.177 16276.794 logical ext2 > 14 16276.825 17233.791 logical ext2 > 15 17233.822 18567.312 logical ext2 > 16 18567.343 22379.611 logical ext2 > 17 22379.643 31918.205 logical ext2 > 18 31918.236 41456.799 logical ext2 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: (No Subject): 00068, Andrew Clausen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Partition codes: 00068, Henrik Treadup |
| Previous by Thread: | How to partition for Win98?i: 00068, Heinz Kirchmann |
| Next by Thread: | invalidate: busy buffer: 00068, Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |