|
Re: Recursive partition: msg#00050gnu.parted.bugs
Hi Soren, On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:53:13PM -0000, S?ren Vedsted wrote: > Now starting parted 1.4.18 claims that there is a concurrent partition, and > starting parted 1.6.3 informs the following: > > Warning: unable to allign partition properly. This probably means that another > partition tool generated an incorrect partition table, because it didn't have > the correct BIOS geometry. It is safe to ignore, but ignore may cause > (fixable) problems with some boot loaders. You can ignore this, unless you're using CHS, which is quite unlikely. > Now, what do I do, if I want my logical fat partition back? I was of course > here I saved everything I made, both from the Windows partition and from the > Linux partition. > Can I just go ahead with rescue? Can't hurt! (I presume you're talking about parted's rescue command?) > and how precise shall my guess be about > beginning and ending of the partition? You have to be within 10%. Cheers, Andrew |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | OMG!! : Please stop- Re: 2,88 MB bootimage parted.raw [1/8]: 00050, John van V. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Recursive partition: 00050, Søren Vedsted |
| Previous by Thread: | Recursive partitioni: 00050, Søren Vedsted |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Recursive partition: 00050, Søren Vedsted |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |