|
fscanf performance >10x slower in 2.1.69 compared to 2.1.50 on Windows: msg#00014gnu.octave.bugs
On 10-Apr-2005, Wlmsears Comcast <wlmsears@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | This comparison was made using the octave-forge pre-built binaries compared | to a recent local build of 2.1.69 using the latest (gcc 3.3.3) cygwin | package. This isn't a benchmark, but rather a real problem. I suspect that the real problem is the peformance of exception handling in g++ 3.3 (and 3.4, and probably 4.0) for Cygwin. For more details, see the following bug report for GCC: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563 jwe ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html ------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: fscanf performance > 10x slower in 2.1.69 compared to 2.1.50 on Windows: 00014, John W. Eaton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | fgetl hangs reading serial port: 00014, John W. Eaton |
| Previous by Thread: | fscanf performance >10x slower in 2.1.69 compared to 2.1.50 on Windowsi: 00014, Wlmsears Comcast |
| Next by Thread: | Unable to compile v2.1.62 on AIX 4.3.: 00014, gerry . starrs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |