logo       

Re: Disclaimers in Email Sigs: msg#00024

gnu.mingw.msys

Subject: Re: Disclaimers in Email Sigs

Keith MARSHALL wrote:

> Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> I did not mean to cause any offence by my signature. As you suggest,
>> it is a corporate policy that requires the signature be appended by
>> default to all emails; however it is enforced on the client and so I
>> do have the capability to remove it manually.
>
> Oh. I didn't take offence; apologies if my response gave that
> impression.
>
> I have recently seen similar criticism of this practice on another
> list -- can't remember which one. As Julien has noted, such content
> really is inappropriate for list mail, and does tend to accumulate
> clutter in the list archives, particularly if it isn't cut from
> follow up postings.
>
> It's one of those little irritations which, along with top-posting,
> and HTML content, I would prefer not to see on this list, if it can
> be avoided.

If you're really bothered by such things, perhaps you might get the
soureforge ml admins to run posts to the list through a procmailrc file.
Eg:

#=========================================================================
# Removing signatures from mailman lists
:0 f
* Delivered-To: i..er-c....e-G7Jjy744/yUAvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| sed -e '/^-- $/,$d'
#=========================================================================


Given that SF add their own junk, a filter such as

sed '/^-\{55\}$/{
$!{
N
/This SF\.net email is sponsored by:/{
:loop
$!{
N
bloop
}
d
}
}
}'

would be rather nice ;-)

Angus





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise