Subject: Fwd: 12 off xanax, valium - Overnight delivery - msg#00056

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Problems installing dependant libraries

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Fredrick Meunier wrote: > > Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > The fundamental problem is that Automake does not have an overall > > coherent understanding of the library dependencies when libraries are > > built using a recursive build. Without understanding the library > > dependencies, it is difficult to see how relinking would work. > > In my case it is a non-recursive build with _LIBADD entries for all the > inter-library dependencies, my problem boils down to installations being > done in the order specified in lib_LTLIBRARIES, even if _LIBADD entries > list dependencies that are violated by this ordering. As the entries for > these lists are autogenerated in my project, I would prefer not having > to hack the generators to mainain a particular order for the libraries > as this is neccesarily brittle. I totally agree that Automake has no reasonable excuse for not installing libraries in the correct order for non-recursive builds. It has all of the information it needs, and already generates the correct rules to build the libraries in the correct order. Since Automake is implemented in Perl, it has plenty of power at its disposal to compute the correct library installation order. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Get cheap via-gra

Generic viagra, at cheap prices. Most places charge $20, we charge $3. Quite a difference, right? An amazing erection EVERY TIME is guaranteed to you! Go into sexual overdrive today... vroooom! Shipped to the whole world.Your solution is here: http://www.mega-health.net/via/?oxygen ----- The link below is for people who hate spam..... http://www.mega-health.net/off.html _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list Libtool@xxxxxxx http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Another stable release?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any objections. Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3? Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQFRxiriDAg3OZTLPAQJswgP9GEbCV63qoF9QiV0wSBvdL9eJGFIV68uB XAFn7ydeEowoLgl6QH5YdHmwRj3xD+/e235YB/TjYfw08qjggFKX9AyDKlVDfDoz 9WLxazKuGHxX1gi2FLtJcbvul1Mf1PG6wM6RFpi6ECazEFfVWUxakb7pvInDDcTr 11IfMUxbt58= =dqxT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

libltdl & FreeBSD 5.0

The package I maintain has about 100 modules. When loading all of the modules in succession, failures are observed when loading some of the modules even though these modules do load individually. When modules fail to load seems to depend on which dependent program requests the loading. The error information returned by libltdl doesn't seem to make any sense since it refers to unresolved symbols from previously loaded modules. Removing just one problem module from the load request causes all of the loads to succeed. The modules do all load ok under Linux, Solaris, AIX, IRIX, and HP-UX. Is anyone aware of FreeBSD-specific issues with module loading? Is there some resource limit that may be expended? Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen