logo       

Re: Another stable release?: msg#00053

gnu.libtool.general

Subject: Re: Another stable release?

On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 06:32:04PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 17:47, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:27PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 14:51, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am
> > > > volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any
> > > > objections.
> > > >
> > > > Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3?
> > > >
> > > 1.5.4 :-)
> >
> > I'd like to see the following patches in the next 1.5 release:
>
> > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00092.html
> >
> This needs a version written for HEAD as well, we shouldn't patch
> branch-1-5 until HEAD is patched.

Done.

> > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00131.html
> > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-03/msg00018.html
>
> These two need checking and applying to HEAD first (are the patches
> against HEAD?)

Will do now. We never submit patches for HEAD as we don't use it in
production.

--
albert chin (china@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise