Re: Another stable release?

On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 17:47, Albert Chin wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:27PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 14:51, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am
> > > volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any objections.
> > > 
> > > Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3?
> > > 
> > 1.5.4 :-)
> 
> I'd like to see the following patches in the next 1.5 release:
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00069.html
> 
This one's tied up in a fix to the "preferring .la libraries over
earlier non-.la libraries" patch.  I'm back on top of things now, so
expect the combined patch RSN (I'm trying to get LT_LANG/LT_TAG out of
the door atm.)

>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00092.html
> 
This needs a version written for HEAD as well, we shouldn't patch
branch-1-5 until HEAD is patched.

>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00131.html
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-03/msg00018.html
> 
These two need checking and applying to HEAD first (are the patches
against HEAD?)

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
Libtool@xxxxxxx
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool