|
Re: quick question: msg#00095gnu.libtool.general
"Pete Mocat" <kyo23@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I have a quick question - I hope it is not out of place but I believe > it is a simple question. > > Short version: > > * installed a binary and got a libtool error > * I did: ln -s /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.0.0 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.0 > * all seems well > * good idea? or will this cause future problems? The libltdl.so.3.0.0 will have a DT_SONAME of "libltdl.so.3". libltdl.so.0 is, in some way, binary-incompatible, which is why the soname changed. Depending on the symbols your program requires, this may work, but then again, it might not. To be safe, recompile/relink against the new libltdl, or install the old libltdl in addition. -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: shell wrapper bug exists in 1.4.3, too: 00095, Bruce Korb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: shell wrapper bug exists in 1.4.3, too: 00095, Kevin Ryde |
| Previous by Thread: | quick questioni: 00095, Pete Mocat |
| Next by Thread: | pkg-config ltdl?: 00095, Wesley W. Terpstra |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |