Re: Pending release of 1.5

Robert Boehne wrote:

> Yes, that would be fine.

> "Schleicher Ralph (LLI)" wrote:

> > My original patch required to explicitly add a dot.  Do you accept a
> > patch that restores the original behavior?

I've attached the patch to this message.
Here is the ChangeLog entry:


2003-02-11  Ralph Schleicher  <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

        * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Prepend a dot to
        the value of the shrext (aka shared_ext) variable and delete it
        from the library_names_spec and soname_spec definitions.  That
        way the user can omit the shared library suffix by setting it
        to the empty string.
        * doc/libtool.texi (Link mode): Update the manual.


-- 
Ralph

libtool-20030210.diff
Description: libtool-20030210.diff

_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
Libtool@xxxxxxx
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool