|
osdir.com mailing list archive |
|
Subject: Re: Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW - msg#00169List: gnu.libtool.generalBob Friesenhahn wrote: The MinGW patch uses lib<base>-<number>.dll for DLL naming, I thought the consensus was <base>-<number>.dll (no lib)? Or am I remembering wrongly? I prefer Bob's method. Earnie. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date: click to view message previewRe: Proposed libtool patch for MinGWBob Friesenhahn wrote: The MinGW patch uses lib<base>-<number>.dll for DLL naming, otherwise the naming is the same as Cygwin. Cool. I'm happy. This problem has already been anticipated and addressed. Good to know. The patch looks for an existing Cygwin installation and tries to overwrite any existing DLL files. Just kidding. :-) Lovely! Sounds perfect. --Chuck ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm Next Message by Date: click to view message previewRe: Re: MinGW libtool DLL failureBob Friesenhahn wrote: If libtool was intended to be an extension of Autoconf/Automake, then it should certainly have been absorbed into Automake, and not exist as a stand-alone utility at all. Do you have examples of libtool use without autoconf and/or automake? Why does libtool.m4 get installed into share/aclocal/? AFAIK, libtool without autoconf/automake doesn't exist. Earnie. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm Previous Message by Thread: click to view message previewRe: Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGWBob Friesenhahn wrote: > The MinGW patch uses lib<base>-<number>.dll for DLL naming, I thought the consensus was <base>-<number>.dll (no lib)? Or am I remembering wrongly? Max. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm Next Message by Thread: click to view message previewRe: Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGWEarnie Boyd wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: >> Bob Friesenhahn wrote: >> >>> The MinGW patch uses lib<base>-<number>.dll for DLL naming, >> >> >> I thought the consensus was <base>-<number>.dll (no lib)? Or am I >> remembering wrongly? >> > > I prefer Bob's method. OK. Max. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm Loading Comments...
|
|
