|
Re: wrong xdeltas for libtool: msg#00061gnu.libtool.bugs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12 Apr 2004, at 23:27, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Scott James Remnant wrote: I think the original intention was to avoid recompressing the delta between the compressed tarballs... I just followed Gord's original convention without thinking it through :-/ You're deltafying the actual tar files, we're deltafying the tar.gz Agreed. Running xdelta over the uncompressed tarballs makes more sense. Feel free to twiddle the delta-xdelta rule in Makefile.maint :-) Cheers, Gary. - -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. gary@{lilith.warpmail.net,gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFAe+nlFRMICSmD1gYRAjvmAJ4jbRwsVT0bA1I2IhhHqQtc5Yn6uQCeOPCA D4bBeEsosDp/Do9pVyCM8Zc= =r2e5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | VIRUS NO SEU EMAIL PARA jane: 00061, postmaster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Returned mail: 00061, Symantec_AntiVirus_for_SMTP_Gateways |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: wrong xdeltas for libtooli: 00061, Peter O'Gorman |
| Next by Thread: | VIRUS NO SEU EMAIL PARA jane: 00061, postmaster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |